A Survey of CNR 470 Alumni

Evaluating effectiveness of CNR 470 (Integrated Resource-Management Planning)



What is this inquiry about?

The College of Natural Resources (formerly College of Forestry, Wildlife and Range Sciences) at the University of Idaho invites you to participate in this alumni evaluation survey of CNR 470.

The purpose of this on-line survey is to help the College better understand the long-term effect of the 470 course once students begin working as professionals in the field. Responses will help us evaluate the effectiveness of the course and improve it.

Who should answer this on-line survey?

This survey is targeted at students who took the CNR (FWR) 470 course in 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.

Anyone who has taken 470 should complete this survey.

A small group of former students participated in an interview process asking for some initial input about the course. Those responses assisted us in developing this on-line survey. We would ask that those who provided interview responses to us also please complete this survey.

Am I safe in giving my opinions and should I participate?

Please be assured that your responses will go directly to the University of Idaho and will remain anonymous. Your name will never be linked to your answers.

 

 
Please enter your name:          

 

What is your current job position or situation? (please check one)

Position related to natural resources

Title of Position

Position not related to natural resources Title of Position
Graduate Student Department & School     
Undergraduate Student
Currently Unemployed
     

Finally, as an incentive to encourage your participation, the University of Idaho will be sending $25 REI gift certificates to randomly selected respondents who participate.

We thank you for your help to improve the 470 course for future CNR students at The University of Idaho.

(Hint: An easy way to move from one question box to the next is to use your "Tab" key.)
When you are finished just click on the SUBMIT button at the bottom of the survey.

 

First, a few questions about when you took the CNR 470 course.

 

1. What semester and year did you take the CNR 470 course?
  (please check one)   (please check one)  
 

Spring

Fall

 

1999

 

2000

don't remember

2001

 

2002

 
2. Indicate your major while in the CNR program.
  (please check one)        
 

Fisheries

  NRECB RRT  

Forest Products

  Range Wildlife  

Forest Resources

       

3.

What specific project did your group complete?

 

Next, a couple of questions about the value of the CNR 470 course to you.
 
4. Please rate how valuable or not valuable CNR 470 was to you:
  a. Value to you while taking the course 
  b. Value to you since taking the course  
     
5. Compared to other senior-level courses, the workload in 470 was:
     
This section addresses the effectiveness of the instructors in 470.
6. Rate the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the instructors in 470.
  a. Class organization
  b. Communication with students
  c. Communication with each other
  d. Grading consistency
  e. Use of clear grading standards (rubrics)
  f. Administration of course (posting grades, etc.)
       
The next series of questions ask you about various aspects of the class.
7. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with these statements about the 470 course.
  a. CNR should continue having a required
capstone course.
 
  b. Interdisciplinary team courses should be
required earlier in the curriculum.
 
  c. 470 should be worth more than 3 credits.  
  d. The structure of the course was effective.  
  e. 470 was talked about negatively by students
more than other classes.
   
. f. 470 should be taught by a team of instructors
from different departments.
 
  g. The 470 project focused on useful skills
applied to a real-life project.
 
  h. 470 gave me useful job skills.  
  i. 470 repeated material and skills that I
learned in other courses.
 
  j. I didn't learn as much as I could have in 470
because projects didn't pertain to my major.
 
  k. I learned a lot from 470 about approaches to
making sound management decisions.
 
  l. Our project was too hypothetical or artificial.  
  m. 470 was too much work.  
  n. 470 is most effective when students can choose
their own projects (project area, objectives)
 
  o. I did not learn enough in 470 about key
management issues.
 
  p. Our project was superficial and didn't teach
me much.
 
     
8. Indicate if more or less emphasis should be placed on the following elements in 470:  
  a. Hands-on, applied experience  
  b. Gathering own data  
  c. Experience with EIS  
  d. Experience with NEPA  
  e. Focus on private sector  
  f. Natural resource law & regulations  
  g. Class time in a computer lab  
  h. Local project  
  i. Individual projects  
  j. Team work  
  k. Focus on government sector  
  l. Focus on industry  
  m. Lectures  
  n. Leadership training  
  o. Technical report writing  
  p. Job application process  
  q. Ethics  
  r. Interacting with the public or stakeholders  
  s. Using existing data  
  t. Agency involvement with projects
     
The next section asks about your experience working in groups in 470.
9. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with these statements about working in groups in the 470 class.
  a. My experience in 470 of working in groups was a positive one.  
  b. Team members were held accountable to do their share.  
  c. I believe my curriculum prepared me well to work in groups
in 470.
 
  d. I'd rather work alone on projects.  
  e. Group work in 470 helped prepare me for the real world.  
  f. Some of my group members were lacking in necessary skills.  
       

 


If you are currently completing an undergraduate degree or are unemployed, please skip to question #16 by
clicking here!    

 
     
 
This section asks you to consider how useful aspects of the 470 course are to you.
10.   How effectively did 470 teach you skills in the following areas? (please rate each skill)
11.   How important are these skills for your current work situation (e.g., job, graduate school)? (please rate each skill)
 
Skill 470 taught me: Importance in my job:
a. Writing skills    
b. Team work skills    
c. Interdisciplinary perspectives    
d. Designing power point presentation    
e. Delivering a presentation    
f. Applying research skills    
g. Sustainable management    
h. Decision-making & problem-solving    
i. Proposal writing    
j. Poster design/development    
k. Technical report writing    
l. Grant writing    
m. Using GIS    
n. Communication & public relations    
o. Developing a management plan    
p. Designing a conceptual model    
q. Compromising & reaching consensus    
         
12. What are the three skills you now recognize are most useful to you in your career?
 

 

13. How well did 470 prepare you for your current work situation (e.g., job, graduate school)?   
       
14. How well did CNR's college-wide core curriculum prepare you for your current work
situation (e.g., job, graduate school)?
     
15. How well did your overall undergraduate program at UI prepare you for your current work situation (e.g., job, graduate school)?
16.    
16. What did the 470 course NOT cover that it should have?
     
17. Based on your life and work experience since taking the course, are there things you'd suggest to improve the 470 course?
 
     
18. What are the two or three most important things to make it more relevant and useful?
 
     
19. There are four courses in the CNR Integrated Core Curriculum:
  FOR/Range 221 Natural Resources Ecology;
  FOR 235 Society and Natural Resources;
  Field Ecology 302 and
  CNR 470
  Please indicate how effective or ineffective you perceive this curriculum was in accomplishing each of the following six goals of the Core Curriculum during your academic program here at the UI.
A. Develop interdisciplinary views and think creatively. FOR/Range 221  FOR 235  Field Ecology 302 CNR 470
B. Understand ecological principles in human and natural systems. FOR/Range 221 FOR 235  Field Ecology 302 CNR 470
C. Understand and respect the philosophies, values, and ideas which form the basis of natural resource disciplines. FOR/Range 221 FOR 235 Field Ecology 302 CNR 470
D. Effectively participate in diverse groups. FOR/Range 221 FOR 235 Field Ecology 302 CNR 470
E. Solve complex problems in new situations. FOR/Range 221 FOR 235 Field Ecology 302 CNR 470
F. Formulate and communicate sound judgments even in conditions of conflict and ambiguity. FOR/Range 221 FOR 235 Field Ecology 302 CNR 470
           

Congratulations--You are finished as soon as you SUBMIT your answers!

How to submit your answers:

When you have finished providing answers to all of the questions for which you have knowledge, please click on "SUBMIT" below. Your answers will be immediately sent to our data base.

If, for some reason you want to submit additional answers, please reload the survey. Be sure to include your name before you enter additional answers. When you "Submit" your additional answers, we will add your new data to your prior submission.