|
|
Five Steps to Becoming a Peer Monitor
Introduction
/ How it Works /
Peer
Monitor Training / One
Program Director's Story / Resources
Peer
monitor selection
and preparation
Any
TRIO project director or full time project administrator is eligible to
become a peer-monitor. This assures that monitors both have experience,
and have the authority to be away from the program to attend trainings and
conduct site reviews. (STEP 1)
STEP 2
- Attend a special NASP or UI TRIO Training
Candidates participate in a training sponsored by the Northwest Association of
Special Programs or the University of Idaho/NASP TRIO Training Project.
Although experience is necessary to conduct a site review valuable to
the program being evaluated, it is not adequate. A thorough knowledge of the site review process is also necessary.
This process is addressed in trainings.
STEP 3 - Participate in a review of your own
programs
The peer-monitoring candidate must participate in a site review
of his/her own program.
This experience impresses upon the candidate the perspective of the
project staff undergoing a review. The process is designed to be instructive without being traumatic.
Undergoing a site review
lends insight invaluable to the peer monitors.
STEP 4 - Observe a peer review
The peer-monitoring candidate also must participate, as an
observer, in a site review of one or more other projects.
As a final step in the training process this requirement allows the peer
monitor candidate the opportunity to see the process in action without having to isolate compliance issues as per EDGAR, OMB, and
Department of Education Regulations.
The program being reviewed is not asked to cover the cost of
someone participating as an observer. It is the policy of the Peer Review Program to view such observation as professional
development and as such it is an allowable program cost for the person being trained.
STEP 5 - Stay current with regular trainings
In order to stay current, the peer-monitoring candidate must
attend regularly scheduled training, usually held during NASP conferences and attending a legislation/regulation federal training
every other year.
Apart from staying up-to-date on the rules and regulations governing
TRIO programs, this allows peer monitors to address issues as a group, considering them from various different perspectives.
Previous
/ Next: One Program Director's Story
|
|
Pat Clyde says peer reviews can improve programs
and make real audits "less scary"
Lucia Loera, director of Washington State
University TRIO Student Support Services requested a review just months
after she assumed leadership. Her story |