Description

Research involves the natural human actions of asking questions and finding answers.  The beginning state of a research project is an engaging and relevant question and the end state is an answer to this question.  The heart of research is validation. When a researcher validates an answer, they bend over backwards to perform every reasonable check to ensure that their answer is an appropriate representation of reality.  The context of research is social.  New knowledge created during research is linked to knowledge that was created by previous researchers.  New knowledge is only accepted after it has been presented to and critically reviewed by a community of researchers.  Social science research, the topic of this page, involves research questions that involve interactions between people. 

Relevance  

The research process is a time effective way to discover best practices for elevating learning and professional growth of others.  At present, most teachers advance their practices by a trial and error process. In general, a trial and error process is time consuming, ineffective, and leads to anecdotal findings that cannot be transferred to others.  In contrast, the research process helps a teacher focus on that which is most important, it fosters review and application of known knowledge, and it leads to results that extend the body of knowledge.

Methodology

Step 1.  Research Question.  Inventory needs, select the most important needs, identify relevant literatures, acquire and review key literature, synthesize known knowledge, generate multiple questions, evaluate the questions, and select one more questions.   Your question needs to be only good enough so that you can move forward with the next steps.

Step 2. Writing.  Begin writing the paper in parallel with the research process.  For early drafts, use lists of ideas.  Write in organized sections--these section describe the present situation, needs for the research, research question, literature review, methods, results, analysis and discussion of data, and conclusions.  Write the abstract last.  As you write drafts, write just enough to allow you to move forward.

Step 3. Research Strategy.  Select the epistemology and theoretical perspective (see Creswell. 2003).  Select an approach from one of three categories: qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods.  Select the specific methods with the category.  Determine how to achieve validity and reliability (as appropriate).  Design, build, and test instruments.  Note--consulting with an expert in social science research methods is helpful in this step.

Step 4.  Plan the Research.  Organize the research in phases, organize each phase into specific tasks, balance project resources with the requirements on the tasks, organize tasks along a time line, define key milestones, assign owners to each task, obtain committment for each team member, develop a document management system, and create a simple Gantt chart that will guide the project.

Step 5.  Gather Data.  Follow the project plan, modify as needed, hit key milesones, and end up with the raw data.

Step 6. Process Data ==> Construct Knowledge. Organize raw data into a format suitable for presentation, interpret data, make inferences, relate inferences to existing knowledge, test for and challenge validity, synthesize inferences into main finds.

Step 7.  Present Results.  Write final draft of paper.  Peer review with colleagues.  Modify.  Submit for presentation and publication.  Process peer reviews and improve the paper.  When a paper is rejected, fix the problems and resubmit, learning in the process.

 

  Resources

At present, no additional resources available.

References

Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
 

Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

National Research Council (2002). Scientific research in education. Committee on Scientific Principles for Educational Research. Shavelson, R.J., and Towne, L., Editors. Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

 

 

Partial Support By:
Grant # EEC-0202293
Program Director Sue Kemnitzer
Grant # DUE-0088591
 

Scholarship Community Leadership Team
Steve Beyerlein      Don Elger      Dan Apple