Instructor:
Camille Stevens-Rumann
Wildland Fire Program
Instructor and Research Scientist
College of Natural
Resources
Office: Phinney
306 University of Idaho
Phone: (208)
885-8340
Email: csrumann@uidaho.edu
Contacting me:
I will try to respond to
your emails within 24 hours, and this is the most efficient way to get in
contact with me.
Learning
outcomes
Upon
completing this course, you will be able to:
-
Understand fire as
an ecological and biophysical process.
-
Characterize fire
over space and time, including the fire regimes and the factors
affecting them.
-
Apply fire ecology
knowledge to ecological restoration and fire management issues.
Course
Overview
This online class is designed to give you an in-depth understanding of
fire ecology and implications for ecologically-based fire management in a
variety of wildland ecosystems. You will learn about the ecological effects
of fire on plants, animals, soil, water and air. Our discussions about fire
management will address current issues, including fire management in the
wildland/urban interface, climate change, and effects of fires on
watersheds, streams and riparian areas. We'll also read current scientific
literature to gain familiarity with fire ecology research. We will emphasize
fire as an ecological process in wildland ecosystems, how to characterize
and predict fire effects over time and space, and how to apply this to
restoration ecology.
Grading
Assignments |
Points |
Exams 3 (150 points each) |
450 |
2 Comparison papers (100
points each) |
200 |
Briefing paper |
110 |
Weekly reading questions (11
total, drop lowest grade 15 points each) |
150 |
Introduction |
40 |
Muddy moments (5 each worth 10pts) |
50 |
Total points |
1000 |
Extra credit |
20 |
*Assignments
turned in late will be marked off 10% of total points available
for every day it is late, unless the student has previously arranged with
the instructor to turn in the assignment late. A previous arrangement must
be made more than 24 hours before the due date unless a medical emergency or
unexpected work conflict has occurred. No other excuses will be accepted and
due dates will be strictly enforced. Any medical emergencies must be
accompanied by a doctors note on official letterhead.
*
Grades will be based
on the total number of points received in this class:
A = 900-1000
B
=
800-890
C
=
700-790
D
=
600-690
F < 600
Exams
You will have three exams, which will focus on concepts
and definitions (with examples), as well as on issues and applications in
fire ecology and management. Exams will include short essay questions, which
will require you to utilize class readings, current fire ecology tools and
the internet. All exams will be take home and open book. However, I expect
you to cite relevant source when applicable.
Comparison Papers
This is a 3-5 page paper comparing and contrasting two
topics. I will provide you with 3 options for comparison for each of the two
papers. You will be required to choose one and discuss how the topics
differ. The first will be a comparison of historical fire regimes in various
ecoregions across the world and the second will be a comparison of fire
effects in different ecosystems. You will need to support your statements
with relevant literature used in class, as well as relevant papers you
research on the topic.
|
Possible
Points |
Both topics
are well explained and accurately compared |
25 |
Examples and
diverse citations are used effectively to support and lend
credibility to the introduction and synthesis of published science
relevant to this issue. Opinion and recommendation are clearly
identified and supported by the science. |
10 |
Correct
grammar, spelling and punctuation. No slang. Format as required for
citations. Limited use of technical jargon. Terms are defined.
Tables and figures, if any, are used effectively, formatted
correctly, referred to in the text, and the source(s) of data are
identified in the title of the table(s) or figure(s). |
15 |
Very well
organized; reasoning is clear and logical throughout; writing is
concise; writer synthesizes current scientific information and uses
this to support conclusions. |
50 |
TOTAL |
100 |
Briefing
paper
You will have to write a short, well-structured 3-5
page briefing paper that quickly and effectively inform decision-makers
about an ecologically-based fire management issue (page count does
not include figures, tables and literature cited, and I encourage you to
include figures and tables). Your briefing paper must include a introduction
(clearly state the issue and why it is significant), background synthesis of
relevant scientific literature (what is and isn't known, implications for
the future), and conclusion (a summary of the important ideas from your
paper and your recommendation based on the science). Write to communicate
clearly with a senior-level decision maker who hasn't read the science. Your
first version must be a complete, professional paper reflecting your best
work (it is not a first draft), and you must incorporate my comments on your
first version into your final version. Before you turn it into me, I
strongly advise you to your paper with other students in the class,
coworkers and anyone else so that you can incorporate their feedback and
produce a strong paper. I expect these papers to be formatted as a
scientific paper (following format of citations, tables and figures as
required for the journal
Fire Ecology). I will base my grade of your paper on the rubric
included below.
HINTS: Think of your topic in terms of a specific question or
problem. For example "Do large-scale mountain pine beetle outbreaks affect
alter the probability and effects of future fires?" Another example might be
"Does the reintroduction of prescribed fire in ponderosa pine forests
increase the risk of mortality in old growth trees?" Think of yourself as an
analyst, advocate, or evaluator. Doing this will improve your chances of
finding something that isn’t overwhelming and is manageable, and that will
lead to a better grade. Please ask me for help. I am more than happy to work
with you on your papers. I have found that students who call or email me for
help tend to do better than those who do not!
Grading Rubric for Briefing Papers First and
Final Version
|
Possible
Points |
The issue is
very clearly stated, and is an ecologically-based fire management
issue. Author explains why it is an issue and what is significant
about it. Paper is focused on the issue. |
30 |
Examples and
diverse citations are used effectively to support and lend
credibility to the introduction and synthesis of published science
relevant to this issue. Opinion and recommendation are clearly
identified and supported by the science. |
10 |
Correct
grammar, spelling and punctuation. No slang. Format as required for
citations. Limited use of technical jargon. Terms are defined.
Tables and figures, if any, are used effectively, formatted
correctly, referred to in the text, and the source(s) of data are
identified in the title of the table(s) or figure(s). |
15 |
Very well
organized; reasoning is clear and logical throughout; writing is
concise; writer synthesizes current scientific information and uses
this to support conclusions. |
55 |
TOTAL |
110 |
Weekly
Reading Questions
You will need to answer questions on the readings
throughout the semester. A full list of the semesters questions are
available on blackboard and blackboard is where you will need to submit
your responses. Every week 2-3 questions pertaining to assigned readings
should be answered using grammar and format similar to that required in
papers for the class. The responses should be prompt but thorough. You will
be graded on the accuracy to which you answered the questions (9 pts), use of
relevant terminology (2 pts) and grammar, spelling, etc. (4 pts).
Muddy
Moments
This is to encourage you to ask questions. I have provided the space to post
your questions so everyone can see and learn from your questions. However,
if you are more comfortable emailing them directly to me, that is fine also.
This will be graded on participation. You must submit 5 questions. Please
contribute throughout the semester; it will be obvious you made up questions
if you send 5 to me the last week of the semester!
Extra
Credit
You can receive extra credit by answering the questions posed in the “Muddy
Moments”. If you accurately and effectively answer a fellow students
question you can earn up to 5 points extra credit per answered
question. The maximum you can earn is 20 points by answering 4 questions.
Academic
Dishonesty and Plagiarism
Academic Dishonesty
of any form is unacceptable and will be taken seriously by the
instructor, the College of Natural Resources, and the University of Idaho.
This includes plagiarism, when you copy materials from other sources
without citing the source or copy someone else's work, and cheating,
copying material from other students during tests or quizzes. In both cases,
you will fail the assignment/exam and the information will be passed on to
the Dean of Students. For more information on College and University
guidelines see: http://www.cnr.uidaho.edu/forres/Academics/plagiarism.asp
http://www.webs.uidaho.edu/fsh/2300.html#ARTICLE%20ll
Accommodations for disabilities
Reasonable
accommodations are available for students who have a documented
disability. Please notify the instructor during the first week of class of
any accommodations needed for the course. Late notification may mean
that requested accommodations might not be available. All accommodations
must be approved through Disability Support Services located in the Idaho
Commons Building, Rm. 333, 885-7200, dss@uidaho.edu.
|