Introduction to the TheatreTHE 101 / University of Idaho
|
|
Chapter
5 / Writing Theatrical Reviews
One of the requirements of this Introduction to Theatre course is
to write two production evaluations of two different theatrical performances.
These responses are to provide an opportunity for you to express informed
and intelligent opinions about a live theatrical experience, while also
incorporating and applying the vocabulary and concepts presented in class.
The following format and guidelines are suggested for these assignments.
You will be asked to evaluate the way in which three theatrical elements
either contribute to, or detract from, the overall production.
These will be assigned by the instructor from among the areas of: acting,
directing, producing, playwriting, and scenic, lighting, costume, and sound
design.
The production evaluation is an important assignment.
It allows you to apply the principles and concepts that you have learned
in class. You will analyze
your own reactions in order to understand your perceptions of the play and then
express yourself with clarity, style, and effectiveness.
You will develop and use good standards of theatrical criticism. The
superior production evaluation is an expression of your thoughts and emotions.
It is also thoughtful, honest, and careful. The superior production evaluation is a well-composed
and supported argument. In
addition, you will want to tailor your review to an audience who has not seen
the play. This is the reading
audience to which you will be making the critical assessment.
Since this will be based on your developing aesthetic sensibilities, you
may want to ask these questions of yourself: Are
you being open to unfamiliar subjects, ideas and conventions? Are
you being too judgmental on issues of morality different than your own? If
there are subjects you feel should not be on stage, can you subjectively
evaluate the play, and temper the review with the understanding that art is an
expression? What
standards you are applying? Why
did you choose them?
Moreover, critical responses, whether professional or casual, ultimately
involve these three major questions: What
was attempted? How
fully was it accomplished? Was
it worth doing?
Additionally, a review will usually contain these facts and elaborations: What
play was performed? Who was
the playwright? What
background information on the playwright is necessary in understanding the play?
When did the performance take place?
Will there be additional performances?
Who was involved in the production that you wish to note?
Were any of the actors, the director, or the designers noteworthy (Not
all may be note-worthy to you)? What
were the apparent goals of the script and the production?
How effectively did the director achieve these goals? Did the actors achieve those goals? Did the designers achieve those goals? Should others see this production? Why?
These evaluations will be graded on form as well as content and you are
expected to adhere to the following rules and guidelines.
Reviews must be typewritten, using 8 ˝ x 11 unlined, white bond paper.
Reviews must be double-spaced with at least 1 inch margins all around the
text. Your review must be
stapled in the upper left-hand corner.
No paper clips, tape, or torn & turned corners will be accepted and
only high quality, dark, dot-matrix or laser jet printed papers are acceptable.
Your name, the date, and the title of both the review and the play should
appear at the top of the first page.
A cover page is unnecessary. Of
course, papers that do not adhere to this assigned form will be penalized.
As for length, please limit your review to a maximum of four (4) full
pages and a minimum of two (2) full pages.
With one-inch margins all around the text, there should be 25-27 lines
per page. As educators, we
will not only be concerned about your developing an understanding of theatre,
but also the articulated expression of that understanding.
In short, you must use proper English.
To that end, the paper must be free of spelling and grammatical errors. Anyone turning in a paper that has not been
“proofed” (fresh out of the typewriter or printer) will undoubtedly turn in
a paper full of grammatical, spelling and typographical errors. Mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and
sentence construction show careless writing and will result in less than maximum
credit for the assignment.
Here are some past repeated mistakes on reviews that you should aware of:
Do not use “preform” when you mean, “perform."
“A lot” (many) is two words no one.
Actors put ”makeup” on their faces (one word, do not hyphenate).
One who does “playwriting” is a “playwright."
“Theatergoer” or “playgoer” is spelled as one word.
Play titles are either underlined or italicized.
Do not put them in quotation marks or in all upper-case letters. Contractions are generally inappropriate to the style
of writing required for production evaluations.
Always put quotation marks outside the punctuation.
Both male and female performers are referred to as actors - there are no
gender specifications. Be
careful to distinguish between the actors (the performers) and the character
(the roles they play). At
each performance you will be given a program.
Use the program to help you correctly identify the production
participants and to correctly spell their names.
In addition, be careful to distinguish between the play (as written by the author) and the production (as presented by the particular theatre organization). Be conscious of gender specific pronouns. Try to construct sentences that do not rely on he, she, him, her, etc. It is extremely advisable that you keep a copy of your paper as insurance against its accidental loss or destruction.
Finally, you are not graded down for expressing and defending your honest
opinions. Your views are your own.
You will not get a better grade for favorable comments or a lesser grade
for negative remarks. Write
what you think. Be sure,
however, to state your opinions in clear, concise sentences, and in
well-organized paragraphs. Consider
the production evaluation your best attempt at making a compelling argument for
your opinions. Keep in
mind that it is not enough to state that “the acting was fantastic, but the
scenery was inappropriate and unexciting.”
You must explain what was “fantastic” about the acting using specific
examples to back up your explanation, and you must explain exactly why the
scenery was “inappropriate and unexciting.”
Since you are the writer, it is unnecessary to introduce every opinion
with “I felt that…” Opinions
and observations that are particularly incisive, astute, original and well
supported are hallmarks of the superior paper. |