|
Welcome to Round 2
This
website is the second in a series of three rounds of questions in an inquiry
about determining the effects of snowmobiles on wildlife. Here you will be
asked to rank the priority of information needs for each of seven guilds of
animals. The information needs were distilled from responses about general
issues as well as reasons people gave for focusing monitoring efforts on those
species.
Many
people described issues and concerns related to the social impacts of
snowmobiles, for example visitor conflict. Others were concerned about the
socio-economic effects of snowmobile regulation. These are important questions
of great concern to managers and citizens. In the report from this study, we
will summarize the comments received about those issues in depth.
Purpose of Round 2
This round of questions deals exclusively
with monitoring the biological effects of snowmobiles on wildlife. This more narrow focus is necessary
to help ensure that focused and thorough results will be available for use
during the April workshop. As you recall, that workshop will be devoted to
establishing monitoring protocols to study the effects of snowmobiles on
wildlife.
The
questions below deal with the effects of snowmobiles on specific guilds or
species.
Please respond by submitting this form by March 1, 2001.
You can be assured of complete confidentiality. The data you submit will be
summarized and your name will not be associated with any of your answers.
|
|
|
|
Instructions:
In questions 2 through 8 below first please RANK the importance of information needs for designing a program to monitor the effects of
snowmobiles on wildlife for each species guild (1
= most important, 6 = least important. Use each number only once). Then, please check the biological
level at which it would be most useful to collect each type of
information. To see our definition of biological level, please click
here: DEFINITIONS
(You
can click on the Species Guild to go to a list of the species that were
nominated and the reasons that were given for monitoring each, then
return by clicking on "'Go Back.")
|
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
|
6. |
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
|
|
8. |
|
9. |
|
|
(If you have more
information than will fit in the space provided above, or if it is
more convenient, please feel
free to email your information to us or send it as a file
attachment.)
Email us at: monitoring@uidaho.edu
|
|
|
10. |
Biological Level for monitoring:
For the following types of species, at what biological level must negative
impacts occur and be demonstrated
in order to make better decisions about how to effectively manage
snowmobiles? (Check
all that apply)
|
|
|
|
|
11. |
Overall importance of snowmobile impacts on
wildlife:
In your opinion, where does the
issue of potential snowmobile impacts to wildlife rank among
all natural resource issues in
the land unit where you work (e.g. park, forest, resource district,
wildlife refuge)? (Check one answer)
|
12. |
How do you feel
about the amount of information, authority and public support you possess
to enable you to manage snowmobile use to minimize or eliminate impacts on wildlife?
(Check one answer for each)
|
|
THANK YOU for taking time to complete these questions!
When you have finished, please click the
"Submit" button below:
|
|
|
|
THE END
For more information please feel free to
contact:
Dr. Troy Hall
Department of Resource Recreation
and Tourism
College of Natural Resources
University of Idaho
Moscow, ID 83844-1139
Email: troyh@uidaho.edu
Phone: 208-885-9455
Biological Level Definitions:
(Click here to Go Back)
|
Individual Behavior |
Individual behavioral effects include immediate responses to
snowmobiles such as flight, changes in activity budgets, or habitat
displacement.
|
Individual Physiological |
Individual
physiological effects include relatively proximate changes in key
physiological variables, such as higher heart rates or higher stress
hormone levels than animals that are not exposed to snowmobiles. |
Individual
Cumulative |
Individual cumulative
effects include reduced weight, habituation, reduced
reproduction, or mortality. |
Population |
Population effects
include changes in the abundance, distribution, or connectivity of
the species at the population level. |
LIST OF SPECIES AND REASONS
|
BIRDS
|
|
Owls
(including Spotted, Boreal, Great Gray & others)
|
- Snow
compaction exposes prey species
- Nest
abandonment due to disturbance (Spotted & Boreal Owls)
- Disturbance
may affect breeding behavior
- Threatened
and Endangered (Spotted Owl)
- Lack
of information (Great Gray Owl) Go
Back
|
Turkeys
|
- Lack
of information. Go
Back
|
Bald Eagle
|
- Threatened
and Endangered
- Top
Predator
- Lack
of information
- Easily
disturbed while nesting Go
Back
|
Northern Goshawk
|
- Disturbance
may affect breeding behavior
- Easily
disturbed while nesting
-
Lack
of information
Go
Back
|
Trumpeter Swans
|
- Snowmobile
routes may disturb swan winter habitat
Go
Back
|
Raptors
|
- Possibility
of foraging patterns being altered
- Disturbance
may affect fledging success and population vitality
Go
Back
|
Grouse
|
- Lack
of information
- Habitat
overlaps areas used by snowmobiles
|
UNGULATES
|
|
Bighorn Sheep
|
- Readily
impacted by disturbance in winter range/ Energy Costs
- Concentrate
in small areas during winter months Go
Back
|
Bison
|
- Groomed
Snowmobile surfaces have altered the ecological carrying
capacity of the species
- Groomed
Snowmobile surfaces allow bison to disperse beyond protected
areas Go
Back
|
Deer
--
White-tailed
&
Mule deer
|
- Readily
impacted by disturbance in winter range/ Energy Costs
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater predation
- Abundant
- Winter
range overlaps areas used by snowmobiles
- Compaction
of vegetation by snowmobiles in summer range
- Possible
displacement from secure winter range Go
Back
|
Mountain Goat
|
- Noise
and human presence increase stress during winter months/
Energy Costs Go
Back
|
Moose
|
- Travel
in Snowmobile trails/ increased stress when they encounter a
snowmobile
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater predation
- Winter
range overlaps areas used by snowmobiles
- Possible
displacement from secure winter range
Go
Back
|
Elk
|
- Readily
impacted by disturbance in winter range/ Energy Costs
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater predation
- Possible
displacement from secure winter range
- Winter
range overlaps areas used by snowmobiles Go
Back
|
Caribou
|
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater predation
- Readily
impacted by disturbance in winter range/ Energy Costs
- Limited
range (Woodland Caribou) increases the severity of disturbance
on winter range
- Winter
range overlaps areas used by snowmobiles
- Possible
displacement from secure winter range
|
CANIDS
|
|
Coyote
|
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater predation
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater exploitation of habitat
Go Back
|
Fox
|
- Readily
impacted by disturbance during winter months/ Energy Costs
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater predation
Go Back
|
Wolves
|
- Threatened
and Endangered.
- Top
Predator
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater predation.
- Snowmobile
disturbance may affect denning behavior/ Energy Costs
- Habitat
overlaps areas used by snowmobiles
|
URSIDS
|
|
Ursids (Bears)
|
- Threatened
and Endangered (Grizzly)
- Travel
on groomed snowmobile surfaces: Human/ Bear conflicts may
increase
- Snowmobile
disturbance may affect denning behavior/ Energy Costs
- Denning
areas overlap areas used by snowmobiles
Go Back
|
FOREST
CARNIVORES (Felids & Mustelids)
|
Wolverines
|
- Sensitive
to human disturbance during reproduction/ coincides with
snowmobile season
- Snowmobile
disturbance may affect denning behavior/ Energy Costs
- Denning
areas overlap areas used by snowmobiles
- Loss
of breeding habitat/ may not return to areas previously
disturbed Go
Back
|
Bobcat
|
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater predation
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater exploitation of habitat
Go
Back
|
Mountain Lion
|
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater predation
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater exploitation of habitat
- Indicator
for large mammal food source Go
Back
|
Lynx
|
- Threatened
and Endangered
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces favor competitors
- Readily
impacted by disturbance during winter months/ Energy Costs
- Snowmobile
disturbance may affect denning behavior/ Energy Costs
- Displacement
from hunting habitat due to increased disturbance
Go
Back
|
Fisher
|
- Trapping
access via snowmobiles thought to have increased mortality
- Lack
of information Go
Back
|
Marten
|
- Lack
of information
- Denning
areas overlap areas used by snowmobiles
- Population
numbers may relate to the amount of development within a
particular habitat
|
SMALL
MAMMALS
|
Subnivean
Mammals
|
- Snow
Compaction reduces movement/ isolative value of snow/ survival
- Concentration
of toxins in snow from snowmobile emissions may affect species
- Base
of the food chain
- Habitat
overlaps areas used by snowmobiles
- Food
availability is decreased by snow compaction
- Readily
impacted by disturbance/ Energy Costs
Go Back
|
Rabbits
|
- Important
prey species
- Groomed
snowmobile surfaces allow for greater predation
- Population
numbers affect lynx numbers
|
AQUATIC
ORGANISMS & REPTILES
|
Fish
|
- Increased
toxins due to snowmobile emissions
- Increased
erosion
- Lack
of information Go
Back
|
Amphibians/Aquatic Invertebrates
|
- Increased
toxins due to snowmobile emissions
- Decreased
water quality Go
Back
|
Boreal Toad
|
- Threatened
and Endangered
- Impacts
caused by snowmobiles on high elevation riparian areas
Go
Back
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|