Project Description - Statistics 407/507 - Fall 2022

Collect a research-type data set and analyze the data using methods that are covered in our Experimental Design course. You may use any of the experimental designs we discuss in class except completely randomized designs from Chapter 3. Your project is due in two parts. The first part is just some sentences about the data you have in mind so I can help you set up the analysis. This will be due on October ? via Canvas. If you have not gotten a data set by then just let me know and I can help you find a data set and project. The second part is turning in the project during finals week, and is due (via Canvas) by Thursday, December 15. For Fall 2022 the project will be turned in via Canvas as a Powerpoint file. An example of a previous student project is posted on the course Canvas site. Your presentation should address the following issues (as appropriate): 

  1. The context of the experiment 
  2. Define the experimental design.
  3. Describe the population from which the subjects will be selected. Describe the sampling procedure and the random allocation of subjects to treatments (if you have an observational study then just describe how data were collected).
  4. Describe and conduct the data analysis.
  5. Discuss the implications of your results for this field, and compare your results to other published results. (Most of this should follow from your results and the background information in part 1)


  6. These first part (an idea of the data and questions to be addressed) is due by October ? on Canvas.



Special thanks to Dr. Bill Mickelson, whose Stat 401 Project Description I have borrowed and adapted to make this Project Description.

Note: the rubric I use to grade the presentations uses the following categories: Was the motivation for the research clear? Was the process of data collection clear? Was the choice of experimental design clear? Was the choice of experimental design appropriate? Was the data analysis explained clearly? Was the data analysis appropriate (Including graphs)? Were assumptions checked? Quality of overall presentation and effectiveness of communication?