Comparing tests in the canprestige2.sas program to the tests conducted on page 139 SAS Proc Hypothesis Full model Reduced model M Text Denom MS Reg1 Global I,E,T,IT,ET null Yes X I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 ET I,E,T,IT,ET I,E,T,IT Yes Yes I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 IT I,E,T,IT,ET I,E,T,ET Yes Yes I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 Reg2 Global I,E,T null Yes X I,E,T 50.3 Type I,E,T I,E Yes No I,E,T 50.3 GLM1 (Type I SS) Global I,E,T,IT,ET null Yes X I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 E E null Yes No I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 I I,E E Yes No I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 T T,I,E I,E Yes Yes I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 ET ET,T,I,E T,I,E Yes No I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 IT IT,ET,T,I,E ET,T,I,E Yes Yes I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 GLM1 (Type III SS) Global I,E,T,IT,ET null Yes X I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 E I,E,T,IT,ET I,T,IT,ET No No I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 I I,E,T,IT,ET E,T,IT,ET No No I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 T I,E,T,IT,ET I,E,IT,ET No No I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 ET I,E,T,IT,ET I,E,T,IT Yes Yes I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 IT I,E,T,IT,ET I,E,T,ET Yes Yes I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 GLM2 (Type II SS) Global I,E,T,IT,ET null Yes X I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 E I,E,T,IT I,T,IT Yes Yes I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 I I,E,T,ET E,T,ET Yes Yes I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 T ? seems to be using Type III No No I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 ET I,E,T,IT,ET I,E,T,IT Yes Yes I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 IT I,E,T,IT,ET I,E,T,ET Yes Yes I,E,T,IT,ET 39.9 Key: M = do the models satisfy the principle of marginality? Text = does the test match the one in the text? (X = test not conducted in text) Denom MS = which model is used when obtaining the denominator mean square?