[RSS][Google]

http://unllib.unl.edu/LPP/

Library Philosophy and Practice 2011

ISSN 1522-0222

Information Use Patterns by Scientists: A Case Study of NEIST, Jorhat, North East India

Dr. Rabinarayan Mishra
Assistant Professor
Department of Library and Information Science
Mizoram University, Aizawl 796 009, India

Introduction

Proper and adequate information is indispensable for scientific and economic progress of a nation. A scientist in the broadest sense refers to any person who is engaged in a systematic activity to acquire knowledge or an individual who is engaged in such practices and that are linked to schools of thought or philosophy. Scientists are those individuals who use the scientific method in acquiring information and organize, analyze, and implement it in the area of research.

Scientists  depend on communication with fellow scientists, specialists, and experts to keep abreast of current developments. Research workers almost always rely on the work of others scientists working the same field. Scientists frequently search for information on the latest trends and developments. They also acquaint themselves with innovations in their fields. Thus, information helps the scientists be well-informed. Science and technology in India can be visualized from the following figure

figure1.

1 

Science & Technology (S&T) under the auspices of Central Government of India comprises the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Department of Scientific & Industrial Research (DSIR), Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), Department of Space (DoS), Department of Biotechnology (DBT), and Department of Ocean Development (DOD). However, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), with its 40 institutes dedicated to research and development in well-defined areas and around 100 field stations, is the major organization under DSIR, including the institutions like National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT), and Department of Ocean Development (DOD). There are about 200 national laboratories and an equal number of research & development (R&D) institutes in the Central Sector, with about 1,300 R&D units in the industrial sector and thousands of employees. In addition to R&D establishments, the other major body pursuing S&T activities in India is the country's vast university system comprising 162 universities, 32 institutions deemed universities, and 10 institutes of national importance which are considered to be major sources of S&T, producing around 200,000 S&T personnel every year.

North East Institute of Science and Technology (NEIST)

North East Institute of Science and Technology (NEIST), situated at Jorhat in North East India. It was previously known as Regional Research Laboratory, Jorhat, and it was instituted as a wing of CSIR for research and development in the fields of oil field chemicals, agrochemical, agro technologies for medicinal & aromatic plants, drug & drug intermediates, specialty papers & boards, organic & inorganic chemicals, biochemistry & biotechnology, chemical engineering, geo science & seismicity and building materials. The major thrust of Research and Development (R&D) activities of NEIST has been to develop indigenous technologies and knowledge by utilizing immense natural wealth of the North Eastern Regions of India.

Knowledge Resource Centre

As a policy decision of Government of India, all CSIR laboratories in India were converted to Knowledge Resource Centers (KRC) in 2008 including NEIST Library. Library and Documentation Division, the earlier name of NEIST, Jorhat was established in  1961 to cater to the needs of R&D staff, research fellows, outside students, and universities of North East Region and other R&D and Industrial institutes such as Institute of Biotechnology and Geo-technic studies, ONGC-Jorhat, Cinnamara ONGC complex, Central Muga & Eri Research & Training Institute, Lahdoigarh, Jorhat, etc. The library provided extensive services to the NEIST branch laboratories, which are situated in Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh and Imphal, Manipur. The KRC of NEIST, Jorhat has rich and outstanding collections of national and international journals, books, Indian and foreign patents, standards, reports, annoted bibliography on Dioscorea composita and D. floribunda, Solanum khasianum, Artemisinin, Genus Artemisia, Zanthoxylum Species, Genus Clerodendron, Cinnamomum Species, natural dyes from plants, Zeolites, Zeolite analogue and Zeotype, Hydrotalcites, Anticancer Agents, Taxol, etc. The library as of 2008 has collection strength of 25,000 back volumes of journals, and 23,000 books, 6,000 Indian and foreign standards, 1.5 lakhs of Indian patents, and 6,000 reports of various national and international organizations, a good quantum of e-sources such as CD-ROMs, DVDs, etc. The library subscribes to 79 foreign and 86 Indian journals. Apart from the information provided by the library under study, it also provides a wide range of facilities such as document delivery service, Internet access, photocopying, electronic mail, etc.

Statement of the Problem

Information has a pragmatic value for scientists during research activities. It is obligatory on the part of the research libraries attached to the R& D institutes to provide information services to scientists. The study focuses on information use patterns by scientists engaged in various research and development programs at NEIST, it is mandatory to ascertain whether the scientists are being provided with the pertinent and genuine information by the libraries. The problems associated with libraries are that scientists are not provided with legitimate information due to multiple factors. Scientists are not being provided with subject gateways in their fields. Hence, it is essential to discover the information needs of scientists.

Objectives of the Study

The objectives of the study are to :

  • Determine the information use patterns of the scientists in North-East Institute of Science & Technology, Jorhat.
  • Discover the purpose of use of information, and the nature and type of information required by NEIST scientists.
  • Investigate the channels through which information is accessed by the scientists of NEIST;
  • Ascertain the extent of current information needs and their uses by the scientists; and
  • Correlate the frequency of information needs and habit of library use by the scientists;

Significance of the Study

A research library is the nucleus of an information/knowledge center, which apart from supporting learning, teaching, and research needs of scientists, also acts as a platform for access to scholarly resources in electronic form. Growth and change have always been prominent characteristics of libraries. These characteristics give rise to the development of collections and services within the library system. The research library responds both to changes in the needs of scientists and within the field of information technology. Information and communication technologies have revolutionized in collection development, which mainly focuses on digital materials acquired through gateways, portals, consortia, etc., on an Internet platform. The significance of the present study is that it aims at evaluate the flexibility of these libraries in this fluid environment as well as their capabilities in developing a process to integrate these changes into standard library practice in order to meet the current and future needs of the scientists, research associates, and research fellows.

Scope of the Study

NEIST, Jorhat comprises 175 Science & Technology staff, 16 Junior Research Fellow/Senior Research Fellow/Research Associates, and 34 Project Assistants, a total of 225. This laboratory comprises five major disciplines, including chemistry, biology, engineering, materials science, and geoscience. The present study is not limited to any specific discipline.

Methodology

The present study is based on the literature available in the library of NEIST. A structured questionnaire was distributed among the scientists of all the disciplines of NEIST.  Data obtained through the questionnaire were tabulated sequentially and supplemented with graphs and analyzed. Interviews were also used for primary data collection. Further, URL site of RRL i.e., NEIST, was also explored to obtain primary sources of information for the study, including a personal visit to the Laboratory to scan the Annual Reports, Highlights, Vision Plan of RRL, etc.

Secondary sources of information, such as unpublished dissertations, research results, published journals, books also were used to make the study more exhaustive and authentic.

Analysis and Findings

Analysis by Designation

Analysis of responses by designation of the library users’ under study has been reflected in Table 1 and Graph-1. Altogether 225 questionnaires were distributed to the scientific users in KRC, NEIST, which include 95 scientists, 80 TO/TA and 50 RA/SRF/JRF and PA. Out of 225, a total number of 186 filled-in questionnaires were received which constitute 82.67%.While analyzing the table it was revealed that, the users belong to the category of RA/SRF/JRF and PA falls maximum which constitute 90% followed by scientists (81.05%) and TO/TA (80%). This shows that research scholars to the use of information in KRC.

Sl. No.

Designation

Questionnaire Distributed

No. of Response

% of Response

1.

Scientists

95

77

81.05

2.

TO/TA*

80

64

80

3.

RA/SRF/JRF/PA*

50

45

90

 

Total

225

186

82.67

* RA=Research Associates, SRF=Senior Research Fellow, JRF= Junior Research Fellow,

PA= Project Assistant, TO= Technical Officer, TA= Technical Assistant.

(Table-1: Analysis by Designation) 2

Graph-1: Analysis by Designation

Analysis by Visit to Library

Analysis of visit to the library under study has been shown in Table 2 and Graph 2 which reveals that, out of 186 visitors, the highest number of 110 users visit the KRC regularly which comes to 59.14% followed by the 76 numbers of users who visit the KRC occasionally which constitute 40.86%. This signifies the efficiency of the KRC, which provides the required information and other reading materials. From the above result of analysis it can be concluded that most of the Scientists and other scientific personals are found to visiting in KRC regularly. Some of the users are interested only to use library occasionally during leisure time. This situation has arises due to their limited time, lack of sufficient current literature. Frequency of KRC used by users is high due to location of current and back volume of periodicals centrally and provision of up to date information through INTERNET.

Types of Uses

Total no. of Users

Percentage

 

110

59.14%

Occasionally

76

40.86%

Total

186

100%

(Table 2: Analysis by Visit to Library)

3
Graph-2: Analysis by Visit to Library.

Purpose of Visit to the Library

Purpose of information need or use is another aspect of library visit by the users. Analysis of the Table 3 and Graph 3 shows the purpose of library visit by the users. Users are generally visit the library to access information for writing an article/paper, writing a book, to update knowledge, starting a project, to browse internet, etc. The analysis of the table reflects that scientists come to the KRC for seeking information mainly to update their knowledge (74) followed by writing an article/paper, starting a project, writing a book, to browse internet and others which consists total of 191 (51.62%). Table shows that TO/TA access information mainly to update knowledge (60) followed by writing an article/paper, to browse internet, starting a project, writing a book and others comes to the total of 105 (28.38%) and RA/SRF/JRF and PA mostly like to search information to update knowledge (37) followed by writing an article/paper, writing a book, to browse internet and writing a book and the total is 74 (20%). From the analysis, it is seen that the scientists seek more information as compared to TO/TA and RA/SRF/JRF/PA for satisfying their varying information needs. The analysis also reflects the users mainly used KRC to update their knowledge which constitute total of 171 (46.21%) followed by writing an article/paper (26.22%), starting a project (15.68%), to browse internet (7.03%), writing a book (3.24%) and others constitute lowest in the rank (1.62%).

Designation

Writing An article/Paper

Writing a book

To Update Knowledge

Starting A Project

To Browse Internet

Others

Total

%

Scientists

57

7

74

44

5

4

191

51.62

TO/TA*

22

3

60

7

11

2

105

28.38

RA/ SRF/

JRF/PA*

18

2

37

7

10

0

74

20

Total

97

12

171

58

26

6

370

100

%

26.22

3.24

46.21

15.68

7.03

1.62

100

-

*RA=Research Associates, SRF=Senior Research Fellow, JRF= Junior Research Fellow,

PA= Project Assistant, TO= Technical Officer, TA= Technical Assistant.

(Table 3: Purpose of visit to the Library)

4
Graph-3: Purpose of Visit to the Library.

Frequency of Library Visit

While making an analysis of frequency of the users to the library under study placed below in tables listed below the scholar has consult with the library professionals of the KRC and also studying the attendance register of the three sections namely Journal section, book section and internet section. On the basis of the data collected from the attendance registers of the concerned sections of KRC, the following tables have been prepared. KRC is a loan institution in North Eastern region with large collection of books. Therefore the students and teaching community of technical colleges and universities of entire regions frequently visit the libraries for gathering of information and more specifically to update their knowledge in their respective fields. The scholars and scientists of the institute like engineering colleges of the region make the best use of the KRC for their project work and apprentice training at NEIST for a short duration. These people extensively use the library facilities which are reflected in the following tables.

User Statistics of Journal Section (Monthly) of KRC

Table 4 shows the monthly statistics of Users in Journal section of KRC, NEIST from 4th August 2005 to 10th July 2008.From the table is seen that the highest number of users has visited the KRC during the 2006 as compared to the years 2007, 2008 and 2005. It reflects that the numbers of users in the library are highest in the year 2006. From the analysis it is also found that in December and October 2007, very less number of users was visit the KRC reason being that it is closed due to a number of holidays during the period.

Year

Month

Number of users (Monthly)

% of Library Use (Monthly)

2005
(From 4.08.05)

August

236

39.53

September

202

33.84

October

123

20.6

November

122

20.44

December

150

25.13

Total

597

100.00

2006

January

161

7.97

February

160

7.92

March

172

8.52

Apr

134

6.64

May

215

10.65

June

185

9.16

July

161

7.97

August

238

11.79

September

150

7.43

October

132

6.54

November

131

6.49

December

180

8.92

Total

2019

100.00

2007

January

106

7.51

February

108

7.65

March

104

7.37

Apr

95

6.73

May

111

7.86

June

168

11.9

July

147

10.41

August

188

13.31

September

117

8.29

October

75

5.31

November

120

8.5

December

73

5.17

Total

1412

100.01

2008 (up to 10.7.08)

January

100

13.61

February

100

13.61

March

111

15.1

April

106

14.42

May

158

21.5

June

195

26.53

July

65

8.84

Total

735

113.61

Source: Users Attendance Register of Journal section in KRC (NEIST), Jorhat.

(Table 4: Users Statistics (per month) Journal Section in KRC of NEIST)

User Statistics for Outsiders and Trainee’s in Book Section of KRC (Monthly)

The KRC, NEIST is offered membership to outsiders for utilizing some facility of Library on payment basis. The Director of NEIST has been produce fee-based membership facility to the outsider individuals/institutions. The institution also provides free membership for its trainees. Table 5 shows the monthly user statistics for outsiders and trainee’s in book section of KRC, NEIST from June 2005 to 7th July 2008.From the table is seen that the highest number of users has visited the KRC during the 2006 as compared to the years 2007, 2008 and 2005. It reflects that the number of library use was at the peak in the year 2006. From the analysis it is also found that in October 2005, very less number of users was visited the KRC due to closure of the KRC for maximum number of holidays.

Year

Month

Number of Visitors
(Monthly)

Percent of use
monthly

2005 (from June)

June

18

18.55

July

19

19.58

August

23

23.71

September

5

5.15

October

1

1.03

November

16

16.49

December

15

15.46

Total

97

99.97

2006

January

6

0.97

February

3

0.49

March

18

2.91

April

7

1.13

May

7

1.13

June

29

4.69

July

14

2.27

August

229

36.06

September

285

46.12

October

12

1.94

November

2

0.32

December

6

0.97

Total

618

99.00

2007

January

7

2.65

February

28

10.61

March

5

1.89

Apr

5

1.89

May

3

1.14

June

21

7.95

July

7

2.65

August

6

2.27

September

4

1.52

October

68

2.58

November

102

38.64

December

8

3.03

Total

264

76.82

2008 (up to 10.07.08)

January

17

10.12

February

10

16.8

Mar

1

0.6

April

10

16.8

May

12

7.14

June

105

62.5

July

13

7.74

Total

168

121.70

(Source: Attendance Register for outsider and Trainee’s in Book Section of KRC of NEIST.)

(Table 5: User Statistics (per month) for Outsider and Trainees in Book Section of KRC)

User Statistics (per month) for Permanent Users in Book Section of KRC

The Table 6 shows the monthly statistics for Outsiders and trainees in Book section of KRC, NEIST from 17th June 2004 to 7th July 2008.From the table it is seen that, the highest number of Permanent users has visited to the book section of KRC during the 2005 as compared to the years 2006, 2007, 2005 and 2005 respectively. It is also revealed that maximum number of users fall in the year 2005. But it is surprising to know that during the March 2007 the numbers of users coming to the library are 17 which is very less reason being due to a good number of holidays which compel the KRC to close.

Year

Month

Number of
Visitors
(Monthly)

Percentage
of use
(Monthly)

2004(from
17.06.04

June

29

6.9

July

91

21.67

August

67

15.95

Sept

72

17.14

Oct

50

11.9

Nov

35

8.33

Dec

76

18.09

Total

420

99.98

2005

Jan

51

4.24

Feb

102

8.48

Mar

115

9.57

Apr

72

5.99

May

109

9.07

June

142

11.81

July

179

14.89

August

160

13.31

Sept

102

8.48

Oct

48

3.99

Nov

36

3

Dec

86

7.15

Total

1202

99.98

2006

Jan

47

7.1

Feb

34

5.14

Mar

43

6.5

Apr

30

4.53

May

112

16.92

June

60

9.06

July

37

5.59

August

96

14.5

Sept

60

9.06

Oct

42

6.34

Nov

55

8.31

Dec

46

6.95

Total

662

100.00

2007

Jan

24

5.41

Feb

53

11.94

Mar

17

3.82

Apr

36

8.1

May

43

9.68

June

27

6.08

July

52

11.71

August

50

11.26

Sept

21

4.73

Oct

25

5.63

Nov

64

14.41

Dec

32

7.21

Total

444

99.98

2008 (7.7.08)

Jan

108

28.05

Feb

95

24.68

Mar

28

7.27

Apr

27

7.01

May

50

12.99

June

44

11.43

July

33

8.57

Total

385

100.00

(Source: Attendance Register for readers of Book section in KRC of NEIST)

(Table 6: Users Statistics (per month) for Permanent Users in Book Section of KRC of NEIST)

User Statistics for Internet Section in KRC of NEIST

The Table 7 shows the monthly statistics of Users in Internet section of KRC, NEIST from 4 August 2004 to July 2008.From the table it is clear that the highest number of users have visited the internet section of KRC during the 2006 as compared to the years 2005, 2007, 2008, and 2004 respectively. Hence, it can be revealed that the number of internet use were maximum in the year 2006. From the analysis it is also found that in October 2004, June 2005 and October 2007, no users visited the internet section of the KRC due to the reason that during the period maximum no. of holidays fall.

Year

Month

No. of visitors (Monthly)

%of Internet use in KRC

2004(From August)

August

1

0.91

Sept

5

4.54

Oct

0

0

Nov

17

15.45

Dec

87

79.09

Total

110

99.99

2005

Jan

87

8.04

Feb

183

16.91

Mar

133

12.29

Apr

112

10.35

May

81

7.48

June

0

0

July

48

4.44

August

120

11.09

Sept

135

12.48

Oct

73

6.75

Nov

70

6.65

Dec

40

3.7

Total

1082

100.18

2006

Jan

66

5.44

Feb

71

5.85

Mar

91

7.49

Apr

64

5.27

May

76

6.26

June

101

8.32

July

113

9.31

August

196

16.14

Sept

158

13.01

Oct

115

9.47

Nov

99

8.15

Dec

64

5.27

Total

1214

99.98

2007

Jan

100

15.43

Feb

119

18.36

Mar

17

2.62

Apr

39

6.02

May

108

16.67

June

113

17.44

July

82

12.65

August

19

2.93

Sept

7

1.08

Oct

20

3.09

Nov

24

3.7

Dec

0

0

Total

648

99.99

2008 (up to July)

Jan

34

10.27

Feb

67

20.24

Mar

53

16.01

Apr

61

18.43

May

55

16.62

June

51

15.41

July

10

33.1

Total

331

130.08

(Source: Register on use of Computer for searching Internet at KRC of NEIST)

(Table 7 Users statistics of Internet Section in KRC of NEIST.)

Types of Information Needs

Analysis to the type of information needs of the scientists placed in Table 8 supplemented with Graph 4 depicts that, while 114 scientists uses current information forming thereby, 61.29%, 16 number of scientist need retrospective information forming 8.6% and 56 number require both current and retrospective information forming thereby, 30.11%.

Sl. No.

Information Need

Number

Percentage

1.

Current

114

61.29

2.

Retrospective

16

8.6

3.

Both

56

30.11

Total

186

100

(Table 8: Types of Information Need.)

5
(Graph-4: Type of Information Need)

Types of Document Use

Providing altogether 14 numbers of different types of information sources in the questionnaire, the scientists were asked for multiple choice of their extensively and sufficiently preferred type of documents and the same has been placed in Table 9 along with Graph 9 for clear understanding. It is revealed from the analysis that the scientists extensively use Periodicals (65) as compared to other documents. The scientist uses highest numbers of 536 documents of different kinds, which constitute 53.28%, followed by TO/TA constitute 266 (26.44%) and RA/SRF/JRF/PA constitute lowest number 204 (20.28%) out of total number of 1006 different types of documents that are analyzed from the received questionnaires. From the analysis it is also reflected that users altogether uses 132 numbers of textbooks, which includes scientists (58), TO/TA (41) and lowest is by RA/SRF/JRF/PA (33). Users including scientists use 65 numbers, TO/TA use 38 and RA/SRF/JRF/PA using 20 periodicals in KRC constitute total number of 123 periodicals. The highest numbers of 135 References are used by the KRC users including scientists (64), TO/TA (41) and Ra/SRF/JRF/PA uses 30 numbers of references. The users also extensively use Reviews (114) and Abstracts (112). From the table it is seen that the frequency of use of Conference/Seminar proceedings (57), Theses and dissertations (54), Patents (53), Research Reports (52) and Newsletters (51) are minimum as compared to references, text books, periodicals, reviews and abstracts. The table shows that frequency of use of Standards, Indexes, Bibliographies and Micrographics by the users is not noticeable.

From the analysis it is deduced that most of the users are concerned with reference sources, text books, periodicals, reviews, conference/seminar proceedings, theses/dissertations, patent, research report and newsletters, etc. The rate is very high among scientists as compared to TO/TA and RA/SRF/JRF and PA.

Types of Documents

Scientists

TO/TA

RA/SRF/JRF/PA

Total

Percentage

Text books

58

41

33

132

13.12

Periodicals

65

38

20

123

12.23

References

64

41

30

135

13.42

Conference/Seminar/Proceedings

37

12

8

57

5.67

Patents

33

10

10

53

5.27

Standards

26

13

1

40

3.98

Reviews

59

30

25

114

11.33

Newsletter

26

12

13

51

5.07

Indexes

22

8

6

36

3.58

Abstracts

50

32

30

112

11.13

Bibliographies

25

8

6

39

3.88

Micrographies

6

2

0

8

0.8

Research Report

34

10

8

52

5.17

Theses/Dissertation

31

9

14

54

5.37

Total

536

266

204

1006

100

Percentage

53.28

26.44

20.28

100

*RA=Research Associates, SRF=Senior Research Fellow, JRF= Junior Research Fellow,

PA= Project Assistant, TO=Technical Officer, TA=Technical Assistant.

(Table 9: Types of Document Use)

 

6
Graph-5: Types of Document Use.

Use of Preferred Documents

Data given in the Table 10 supplemented with Graph 6 shows that the number and corresponding percentage of the users using textbooks and periodicals respectively. Analysis reveals that, out of a total respondent of 132 for the variable, while 58 number of scientists (43.94%) prefer to use text-books, 65 number of scientists out of a total respondents of 123 prefer to use periodicals which comes to 52.85% followed by 41 number of TO/TA (31.06%) for text books and 38 number use periodicals (30.89%) respectively. Like wise, while 33 number of RA/SRF/JRF/PA prefer to use text books, 20 number of RA/SRF/JRF/PA prefer to use periodicals as a source of information which forms 16.26%. This shows that, the scientists prefer periodicals as their preferred documents while, TO/TA and RA/SRF/JRF/PA use text books as their favored documents.

User Category

Use of Text-Books

%

Use of Periodicals

%

Scientists

58

43.94

65

52.85

TO/TA

41

31.06

38

30.89

RA/SRF/JRF/PA

33

25

20

16.26

Total

132

100

123

100

Table 10: Use of Preferred Documents

7
Graph-6: Use of Preferred Documents

Access to Internet

Internet is a viable platform for searching information for accelerating research activities. The scholars explored the library users through questionnaire to know the access of internet by the user communities which has been placed in Table 11, where it could be revealed that, 180 users (96.77%) out of 186 access internet for their study/research purpose while, 6 users (3.23%) do not prefer to use internet as information source. The primary reason for using Internet is that the scientists significantly depend on communication with the fellow scientists and also search frequently current information in their concerned field to keep up to date their knowledge. This helps scientists in their further study, starting a new project, inventions and innovations. Internet is the only way for keeping up to date information and because of that the science and technology people more frequently access Internet.

Access internet

Number

Percentage

Yes

180

96.77

No

6

3.23

Total

186

100

Table 11: Access to Internet

Internet Access by Types of Resources

Internet is a global information infrastructure, which enables the scientists to access the information through the medium like text, voice, and graphics in other words multimedia. The electronic sources of information are extensively available on Internet, which includes e-journals, e-books, e-reports, databases etc. E-Resources are those electronic products that deliver a collection of data, be in text referring full-text basis, e-journals, image collection, and other multimedia products and numerical, graphical or time based as a commercially available till that has been published with an aim to being marketed. Data relating to the reasons for internet access in general were obtained through the questionnaire and the same has been placed with the Table 12 along with Graph  7. Analysis shows that the users of KRC mainly search internet for accessing to electronic source of information to promote their learning, research and development. While making a categorization of e-resources, out of 499, 176 number of scientists and others prefer to access e-journals which constitute 35.27% followed by access to e-patent (14.43%) by 72 nos, e-books (12.83%) by 64 nos, e-reports (12.22%) and databases (12.22%) each by 61 nos, e-proceedings (10.02%) by 50 nos and others (3.01%) which includes e-standards, electronic theses and dissertations by 15 nos respectively.

Sl. No.

Internet Access

Number

Percentage

1.

E-book

64

12.83

2.

E-journal

176

35.27

3.

E-patent

72

14.43

4.

E-reports

61

12.22

5.

E-proceedings

50

10.02

6.

E-data bases

61

12.22

7.

Others*

15

3.01

Total

499

100

*Others = E-standards, E-Thesis and E-Dissertation, etc.

Table 12: Access to Internet

8

Graph-7: Internet Access

Internet Access by Designation

The scientists, TO/TA, RA/SRF/JRF and PA of NEIST are the identified categories, which use principally KRC for accessing to different types of information sources. The categories of information resources has been broadly grouped under the following 6 headings as reflected in the table. Among the resources available in KRC, e-resources are found to be used by highest numbers of users of the NEIST. The related variable has been placed with Table 13 supported with Graph 8 which shows the use of different types of e-resources. Analysis reveals that e-journals are being used maximum constituting 35.27% followed by e-patents (14.43%), e-books (12.83%), e-reports and databases (12.22% each), e-proceedings (10.02%) respectively.

Internet Access

Scientists

TO/TA

RA/SRF/JRF/PA*

Total

%

E-books

32

16

16

64

12.83

E-journals

74

58

44

176

35.27

E-patents

46

17

9

72

14.43

E-reports

36

9

16

61

12.22

E-proceedings

32

7

11

50

10.02

Databases

34

16

11

61

12.22

Others

5

8

2

15

3.01

Total

259

131

109

499

100

Percentage

51.9

26.25

21.84

100

Table 13: Internet Access by Designation

9

Graph-8: Internet Access by Designation.

Satisfaction with regard to the Library Services

Satisfaction is one of the important criteria among the use of the library, which basically depend upon the materials that the library possess and imparts service. Analysis to the variable placed in Table  14 reveals that, 170 (91.4%) of users comprising the scientists and others out of 186 are satisfied while 16 (8.6%) number of users are not satisfied. This may be the due to the fact that, the library is situated in the campus and the users are not able to take maximum use of the library materials and services.

Satisfaction

Number

Percentage

Yes

170

91.4

No

16

8.6

Total

186

100

Table 14: Satisfaction with regard to the library services

Rate of Satisfaction

The rate of satisfaction is another important variable in the given area of study to measure the standard of library services. In this study the scholar has measured the satisfaction rate according to the scale of excellent, good, moderate and no comment. The concerned variable has been placed here with under Table  15 supplemented with Graph  9 for clear understanding. Analysis discloses that, 113 users out of 186 respondents have placed their satisfaction rate as good constituting thereby, 60.75% followed by the verdict of 65 users as excellent (34.95%) and 7 users as moderate (3.76%) respectively. Analysis further reflects that only one user placed no comment option which forms 0.54%. Overall it can be opined that, the major chunk of users are satisfied by the KRC services.

Sl.No.

Satisfaction Rate

Number

Percentage

1.

Excellent

65

34.95

2.

Good

113

60.75

3.

Moderate

7

3.76

4.

No comment

1

0.54

Total

186

100

Table 15: Rate of Satisfaction

10
Graph-9: Rate of Satisfaction.

Library Automation

Automation means the use of automatic equipments and machines such as computer and other devices in the libraries. In the process of automation, it should be kept in mind that the ‘change’ is the only constant and the users are ready to accept and adapt to the changing technologies applied through the hardware, software and other technological devices which has become indispensable to keep the library alive in the present setup environment. Libraries need computers, application and trained people to run any modern library systematically. Computer based automated facilities are now the most effective system and necessity. Out of 186 respondents, 114 users comprising the scientists and others are of the opinion that the library at KRC is not fully automated while, 72 respondents (38.71%) opined that their library is automated. It seems from the analysis that, KRC library is not fully automated.

Library Automation

Number

Percentage

Yes

72

38.71

No

114

61.29

Total

186

100

Table 16: Library Automation.

Level of Library Automation

Level of library automation is another variable in the study and the relevant data has been shown in Table  17 complemented with Graph  10. While making an analysis of the same, it could be revealed that, highest number of 93 (50%) users said that their library is partially automated while, 85 (45.7%) users opined that the automation work at KRC is on the process and 8 (4.3%) users viewed that the library is fully automated. It could be deduced from the analysis that the KRC is not fully automated. The automation work of KRC is still on the process barring few services such as, serial control, cataloging of back volume etc. are automated.

Sl. No.

Level of library automation

Number

Percentage

1.

Fully

8

4.3

2.

Partially

93

50

3.

On the process

85

45.7

Total

186

100

Table 17: Level of Library Automation

11
Graph-10: Level of Library Automation

Conclusion

Careful analysis of the data revealed that, the KRC, NEIST is adequately equipped to provide incentive and value added services to the scientists and others with the present collection development. Due to unavailability of a departmental library, the scientists and other users primarily depend upon the resources of KRC to promote their learning, research, and development. The library, however, is equipped with e-resources which have become the primary sources of information for the users of the library under study. The scientists prefer to use the information available through electronic form rather than traditional way. Therefore, subject gateways and portals are required to be provided with to the scientists for better use of information. Further, most of the scientists and research scholars prefer to use current periodicals to keep them update in the knowledge of their interested field. KRC needs to be fully automated for providing value added information and services to the scientists which has become essential in present day context as the library has become a work house for the different R&D programmes in the science and technology institutes, and also due to the increasing demand for processing of data and retrieval of information in the easiest and quickest possible time. KRC is yet to come out with such facilities as the automation work is still in progress.

References

Gorman, P. Information Needs of Physicians. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(10); 1995. pp. 729-736.

Kumar, T.S. Internet and Academic Libraries: Indian Scenario. Library Herald. 36(4); 1999. pp. 89–95.

M., Ram. User Education: Its Method and Technology. Herald of Library Science. 42(1-2); 2003. pp. 54-57.

Mujoo-Munshi, Usha, and Kant, Manuj. Information seeking in Electronic environment. Library Herald. 34 (3-4). 1997. pp. 100-110.

Padmamma, S., Vijayakumar, M. and Vasudevan. Information seeking behaviour of VISL scientists: a study. ILA Bulletin. 38 (1). 2002.pp. 23-26.

Satish, N.G. Information Use Pattern of Rural Development Scientists: A Case Study. ILA Bulletin.23 (3); 1987. pp. 95 -118.

Sharma, Arvind K. Information seeking behaviour of rural people: a study. SRELS Journal of Information Management. 44 (4). 2007. pp.341-360.

Shokeen, Ashu, and Kaushik, Sanjay K. Information Seeking Behaviour of social scientists of Haryana universities. Library Herald. 40 (1). 2002.pp. 28-35.

Wilson, T. D. Model in Information Behaviour Research. Journal of Documentation. 55 (3); 1999. Pp.249-270.

Wilson, T.D. On User Studies and Information Needs. Journal of Documentation. 37 (1); 1981. pp .2-15.

Yates. Information Needs of Human Beings. Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol 11. (1); 1986. pp. 77-89

Annual Report (2005-2006). Regional Research Laboratory, Jorhat.

Annual Report (2006-2007). Regional Research Laboratory, Jorhat.

NEIST News (2007). North-East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat. XXVIII (4). Pp.1-5.

Vision 2010: Strategy and Action Paper, Regional Research Laboratory (NEIST), Jorhat.

Malhotra, Rajiv and Patel, Jay (2008). “History of Indian Science and Technology: overview of Indian Science & Technology”, available at: http://www.indianscience.org/: Reference.2.08.08.department of science and technology, ministry of science and technology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information (2008) (Accessed on 11.3.2008)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientists (2008) (Accessed on 11.3.2008)

http://www.rrljorhat.res.in/RRL/L&D /20 Departments/ 20 RRl/20 Jorhat (Accessed on 11.3.2008).

http://202.54.99.7/ejournal/view_usage_stat_lab_sum.php? Labnam (Accessed on 11-08-2008).

http://niscair.res.in/ (Accessed on 10-08-2008).

http://www.csir.res.in/ (Accessed on 10-08-2008).