Animal First Peoples and the Oral Traditions: an Indian epistemology, ontology and ethics

The Riverbed of the Indigenous First Peoples; Applicable to all of Indigenous North America - Crow, Inuit, Hopi, Navajo, etc.

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The EFFCACY, the HOW.  This all works because:    These oral traditions (in their varied forms) are configurations of phenomena, spatially and temporarily interconnected (Ashammaléaxia "as driftwood loges"; chnis-teem-ilqwes "I am part of all"; monism; not dualism) and endowed with "medicine" (súumesh; spiritual power; snq-hepi-wes "where the spirit lives, from horizon to horizon").    Thus when these human manipulated expressions (symbols in oral traditions and ceremonial activities) of the Creator and Animal People are properly brought forth, acted out in behavior, i.e., aligned with the perennial, archetypal "bones" of the Creation time (the tamálwit, the hnkhwelkhwlnet, and the miyp),     so too are their inherent transformative powers brought forth,   to renew, perpetuate and heal.     

An hierophany - "a shining through of the sacred" is occurring (Mircea Eliade in "Carry Forth the Stories").  When the narrative, song, ritual act, dance, regalia, art forms are aligned with the "bones" of the perennial sacred, a shining through occurs, an hierophany

The Swirling  with Chipmunk and Coyote (Cliff SiJohn).       

"If all these Great Stories were Told, Great Stories will Come" (Tom Yellowtail)     

A transforming, transitory intersection of those participating

 

Story Texts:

- My re-telling of the Dine Emergence Story before some 80 students in 1979.

- Dine (Navajo) Healing Ceremony (Creation Narrative and Drypainting) and Video: Billy Yellow (18 min.; introduced by anthropologist David Mayberry-Lewis, as part of his Millennium Project, 1992; aligning the colorful and geometric symbols of the drypainting -  sandpainting with the Hózhó beauty and harmony of the sacred creation time, the oral traditions of the Yei, the Holy Ones, such as Changing Woman and her children, then of ritually placing the child that is imbued with the Hocho disease and imbalance into the painting and the sands place upon the child, removing the Hocho and reinstating Hózhó and thus health.      From the internal spiritual balance comes an external material healing.

 

 

 

HENCE, in the act of re-telling Coyote’s story,      re-donning the regalia and re-dancing the dance,      re-sitting upon a dry painting,      re-using the Eagle Feathers,     re-fishing the Salmon,    re-gathering the Camas,     re-hunting the Deer,    or re-singing a súumesh song,     the oral traditions and their sacred symbols also perpetuate the world,     re-invigorating life-force and meaning back into the landscape and all of its varied beings - human, fish, animal, plant and rock.      The Creation time is re-traveled,    a camas field re-nurtured,    and an illness healed, re-balanced.  

Reality and the oral traditions are one and the same.  

 

hnkhwelkhwlnet:  phenomenal reality as the  transitory   intersection   of  those  participating (people, animal, spirit, i.e., storyteller, story participant, story animal peoples),  an event always in the making,   anchored to place-based teachings, the miyp,    and in so doing,     transforming that reality.  

 
Does this quintessential statement make sense yet?   Can you restate it in your own words?

 

Reality is THE Act of Baaeechichiwaau - "re-telling one’s own."

  

"Stories make the world,"      they are what is most real.      In re-telling the stories, reality is intensified (not a "suspending of disbelief" in reality) 

– Re-Consider the Blue of Lake Coeur d'Alene and the re-telling of the Coyote and the Rock oral tradition,  

or the Two Bullets not penetrating a body when a pouch is worn, or that are drawn from the body of a young man when prayer of song are properly aligned and given?

  

– Consider "The Vital Act is the Act of Participation"     Who said this and what does it mean??   Implications for us all.

 

Reflect: are there multiple realities, mutually exclusive of each other, realities we can equally participate in at the same time? 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

THE FUNCTION and ROLE (Revisit).  The oral traditions are thus at once(Frey 1995:169-76) :

  

1) didactic, having an educational/teaching role, passing on pragmatic skills, teaching lessons, and disseminating identities.  

Story Text: Rabbit and Jack Rabbit

 

2) have an entertaining function, bringing a smile or a tear and rendering the difficult times less so, as Vic Charlo said, “helping lighten the load and make things more accessible.”  

Story Texts:  BIA official and handkerchief,    "first presidential convention,"     Leroy Seth humor,    and spontaneity

 

3) perpetuate the world.  Run with the Coyote, renewing the creation of the world.   

Story Texts:   the Blue of Lake Coeur d'Alene,     Water drawn from the Sundance Center Pole,           the Two Bullets

"Euro-American audiences are said to suspend disbelief in watching a play, while Navajos can be said to intensify their sense of reality by watching Mái -Coyote" (Barre Toelkin and Tacheeni Scott from Stories . . .  p. 176).     It is never a matter of a story attempting to suspend disbelief, as when viewing a Shakespearian play, but of making the world real and actual.

-  for the Western Apache, "selfhood and placehood are completely interwoven"  (Basso)       wete·pe·m'e·wes  "I am of the land" (Nimíipuu)    

- "It is to swirl with Chipmunk and Coyote"  (Cliff SiJohn)   

- Cabin Stories   and  meaning of  "stories that make the world" 

 

 

 

WHAT IT DOES NOT DO.  The oral traditions, however, are not fundamentally explanatory in nature.  "Because Coyote did such and such, that is why . . . . . !

1.  Such would presuppose that the stories were inventions of human curiosity, created by man to explain what he could not understand, and thus not be creations of the First Peoples, i.e., accounts of their actions. 

2.  Such would presuppose that the stories are earnest but feeble attempts by pre-scientific minds to understand the world, but are inevitably fantasies and false, and certainly not what is most real and true.  

And 3. such would presuppose a separate world out there (Cartesian dualism) that needed explaining, and certainly not an interconnected phenomenal world within which one is a part.

 

POWER OF STORY.    The intersection of those participating.   If all these great stories were told, great stories will come!

 

 

 

 

return to schedule