Welcome to Applied Ethnographic Research Methods (i.e., Anthropological Research Methods). I am Rodney Frey, your instructor. My office is in Phinney Hall, Rm.116, with office hours on Mondays and Wednesdays 9:30 to 12:00, or by appointment. You can contact me at:
Class Days/Times and Location:
Tuesday and Thursday 12:30 - 1:45
ANTH 420 Anthropological History and Theory
STATS 251 Statistics
Our Textbooks are:
For both undergraduate (ANTH 410) and graduate (ANTH 510) students:
Charlotte Aull Davis. Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. 2nd Edition. ASA - Routledge, 2008. (ISBN 978-0415409018)
Rodney Frey and a host of Elders. Huckleberries: Stories from the American Indian experience for research, writing, pedagogy and our humanity. 2014. (course packet at the bookstore)
David Kyvig and Myron Marty. 2nd Edition. Nearby History: Exploring the Past Around You. 2nd edition. AltaMira, 2010 (ISBN 0742502716)
Herbert Rubin and Irene Rubin. 3nd Edition. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Sage, 2012. (ISBN 978-1-4129-7837-8)
Code of Ethics of the American Anthropological Association (PDF)
AAA Ethics, Handbook on Ethical Issues in Anthropology (and 25 Cases), Briefing Papers on Common Dilemmas Faced by Anthropologists Conducting Research in Field Situations, and Final Report of the Commission.
Society for Applied Anthropology, ethical responsibilities.
Informed Consent Form (PDF printable)
Human Assurances Committee of the U of I (go to Procedures link to obtain the Human Subjects Review Summary Form. All researchers participating in “non-exempt” human subjects research are required to take the online course produced by the National Institutes of Health. Copies of certificates of completion will be required before the project will be approved.)
Prospectus (PDF printable)
Course Description: The intent of this course is to provide the student with the necessary knowledge and skills to successfully design, conduct, document and present an applied, qualitative-based, ethnographic or historical archaeological research project. Students will organize themselves into appropriate research units, as either a single researcher or as a team, and select potential topic and potential collaborative partner in the community. Project topics can range from a life-history of a local resident or relative, to the history of a local building. The collaborative partner could be a host community agency, organization, business, family member, and/or individual. In dialogue with the partner, students will design and execute an applied, qualitatively-based, research project that will benefit the host partner community, personage, or domain. Emphasis will be placed on developing and applying research competencies in interviewing and participant-observation data gathering, as well as archival and material culture research, along with interpretative and writing skills. The culminating research and any accompanying recommendations will be shared with the host community, agency, or individual, who will, in turn, critique that research.
Students will explore and gain an appreciation of the ethical considerations and parameters of doing research with human populations and presenting that research to the public. Of special note will be consideration of intellectual and cultural property rights of host communities.
Acknowledging epistemological and ethical extensions from and implications of research, consideration will also be given to the various modes of presenting research, from publication in journals to teaching pedagogy in a classroom.
The course attempts to integrate creative and analytical thinking, basic research design and data gathering, interpretative and explanatory writing and video presentation with the value of doing collaborative and applied, ethnographic and/or historical archaeological projects all within ethically-grounded context.
The over-arching objective of this
course is the acknowledgment by the student of the epistemological relationships
between what you seek to know (i.e., the focus of your research ) and how
you go about that knowing (i.e., your methodology), and the ability of the
student to appropriately apply that relationship in the doing of anthropology.
Key question: How do we go about accessing
and then telling someone else’s story, when that story is predicated on
an ontology and epistemology fundamentally distinct from that of our own, with
making their story our own?
[Return to top]
Grading Distribution: Your final grade will be based upon the total points earned. For undergraduate students, there are two exams (each worth 45 points, for a total of 90 points); the project (10 points possible for the proposal, 20 points possible for the presentation and 70 points possible for the paper itself, for a total of 100 points); and discussion, exercises and reflective writes (10 points). For graduate students, there are two exams (each worth 30 points, for a total of 60 points); the project (10 points possible for the proposal, 20 points possible for the presentation and 70 points possible for the paper itself, for a total of 100 points); the lecture/presentation (for a total of 30 points); and discussion, exercises and reflective writes (10 points). The following scale will determine your grade: 180-200 (90%-100%) = A, 160-179 (80%-89%) = B, 140-159 (70%-79%) = C, 120-139 (60%-69%) = D
[Return to top]
You are currently viewing
To return to the University of Idaho Home Page
Page manager: email@example.com