--------------------------------------------------------- We have indicated that argument forms are repeatable, like building structures. Thus, we should expect to find arguments about a variety of topics that are set up in the same way. We just determined the form for argument (I). Consider the following two arguments that have the same form as (I): Argument (I-A):
Argument (I-B):
If you replaced the sentence after the "If" in the first reason in each with "A" and the sentence after the "then" with "B", you would get the same form as the one we extracted from (I). There are many such forms. Here are three more, just to demonstrate the range: Form (2):
Form (3):
Form (4):
Forms (2) and (3) are what we will call CPAs below, whereas (4) is an example of a PPA. For more about the details of these arguments, see the Expanded Notes sections associated with CPAs and PPAs. A final note about form. You might agree with (I-A) or you might not. Chances are that unless you are a die-hard Terry Gilliam fan, you aren't impressed by (I-B). What this shows us is that when it comes to argument quality, form isn't everything. As we will see in the next section, content matters a great deal too.
|