| |
Introduction
Click thumbnails for a detailed view
|
Residential areas in urban environments must satisfy the basic human
aspirations of attaining water, food, shelter, and security.
Security
includes aspects of both safe neighborhoods and roads where families can
spend time together outdoors and interact with neighbors. Security
is also a component of the access to nearby employment. Crime should be
rare and not physically threatening.
Mixed use development in urban areas
can address access and safety issues by mixing residential units with
retail shops, supermarkets, cultural amenities such as art, theatre, and
dining; and to recreation and open space. When spaces are populated
with users, crime rates drop.
You might think that communities could provide its citizens with
each of the basic necessities but even in the US we know that a growing
number of people live without decent shelter, have too little pure food
to eat and are diminished by the fear of assault, burglary and rape.
There are secondary and tertiary human aspirations. Such as
Access to health care
Access to employment
Access to education, cultural amenities
Access to recreational opportunities
Access to transportation
Access to goods and services
|
Mixed use buildings adjacent to high quality open space
What four basic human aspirations must residential areas
in urban environments satisfy?
|
|
Density is generally
expressed in Dwelling Units per Acre (DU). In small towns and
typical subdivisions in America the densities range from 4 to 5 dwelling
units per acre for detached single family housing.
Duplexes and
cluster housing achieves 6 to 8 units per acre.
Two and threes story
row or townhouses provide about 20 units per acre.
Three story
apartment complexes achieve 25 units per acre.
Multiple story
buildings can achieve densities from 50 to more than 100 units per acre.
These high values are possible partly because underground parking becomes
economically feasible in residential building 6 stories and taller.
Surface parking requires more site area than the building if underground
parking can not be provided. This results in dispersed buildings and
lower residential densities.
The two images shown at bottom left are of a mixed use district in Turin, Italy.
It is comprised of multi-family buildings ranging from 6 to 10 stories.
Densities range from 50 to 125 units per acre.
|
Residential
Residential
In this aerial view of development in Florida, you can see
almost exclusively single family housing that is replacing habitat.
View or a high density residential and commercial
district. Density here is over 100 units per acre (Turin, Italy)
High quality multifamily housing with glass enclosed balconies
High quality multifamily housing with glass enclosed balconies
|
Density and Amenities
Higher densities often mean that developers provide high quality amenities
for the residents. In general, urban amenities increase with density.
Name four such amenities that typically are attained at medium to high
densities (of 50 to 100+ units/acre) that are not found at low densities
< 50 units /acre.
|
Ten story residential tower
High density brings problems and opportunities.
The table below suggests that urban amenities are more readily available
as density increase.
|
*large
retail—department stores, furniture stores, kitchen supply, hardware,
appliance stores
|
|
As density increases, urban amenities increase in order to satisfy
human aspirations. Higher density neighborhoods attract commercial
amenities since the customer base is concentrated. Lower density neighborhoods
don't merit these amenities from an economic return perspective.
Some amenities are extremely expensive for the private or public sector to
develop. These are often shared among adjacent neighborhoods.
The Millefonti District in Turin, Italy is one example that exhibits both
extremes of the impacts of high density development. Comparing two
contrasting neighborhoods identifies urban design strategies that are
successful and ones that are not when density exceeds 50 units per acre.
This image shows a middle to upper middle class neighborhood as an
example. The buildings are 8 stories and have penthouse units on
top. The building are arranged around large landscape spaces.
Density is about 50 units per acre. Notice that each unit has more
than one balcony.
|
High Rise CondominiumsDescribe the
multi-family housing project in the Millefonti District, of Turin, Italy
(case study one) in terms of density, private open space, semi public open
space, parking, ground floor uses, security.
Name two problems encountered with the design
and density of The Millefonti District in Turin, Italy.
Name two possible solutions. |
Case Study One
Open First Floor
|
This complex is fenced and gated
for security and privacy. Notice that the there are no units on the
ground floor. Instead, building sits on one story columns that
create a open landscape. There are views through the building from
the street. This greatly increases the sense of space and openness
of the urban landscape.
A negative aspect of this design technique is the fact that sound can
travel through the open area under the buildings whereas in a ground floor
buildings, it is blocked. This problem could be solved with the use
of glass panels to preserve views but block noise. Privacy is also
reduced but since the landscape is semi public and private balconies are
provided this is not a great concern.
|
|
Case Study One - Project Design
|
The arrangement of the buildings established strong
enclosure while framing views of other buildings in the complex to expand
the sense of living within a landscape park. Since the open space is
well enclosed and spatially organized, boundaries can better be
identified and a sense of ownership can be obtained by the inhabitants.
The distance between buildings is ample and the landscape is of high
quality including semi private sitting areas, tennis courts and children's
play areas.
Another benefit to this housing arrangement is that the neighborhood is
not surrounded by major streets on all sides. In the plan view of a
portion of the complex shows one access street that is used by only the
tenants for access to underground parking. This is also the only above
ground parking located within the building area. Not having a major road
through this area reduces exhaust and noise pollution for the inhabitants.
|
Plan
Framed Views
Entrance to Underground Parking
Name three major benefits of the design used at The
Millefonti District in Turin, Italy (case study one).
|
Case Study Two
|
Since the project was originally
constructed as a low-income housing development, underground parking was
not provided although the buildings are 8 t 10 stories. This omission is
the source of most of the problems of project. About half of the
space between buildings is parking but not clearly identified with
particular buildings. Since the population of the project is high,
it is difficult to determine whether people parking in the lots are
residents of the project. This anonymity resulted in criminal
activity and a reputation that discouraged prospective residents.
The parking lots are visually unappealing and compromise the usable
green space. Planting are poorly placed and are dense enough to hide
shrubs that unwanted people, making the building entries unsafe. The size
and shape of the open space is awkward and prevents a sense of ownership
for the inhabitants.
Unlike many other urban developments, there are no retail or food
stores on the ground floor of the buildings. As a result, the inhabitants
do not have immediate access to those amenities and since there is no
commerce and no street life, no attention is paid to the neighborhood.
One pleasant aspect is the street trees which provide shade for the
buildings, the walkway, and the parking along the street side. Another
negative aspect, however, is that the buildings lack in decorative facades
that play such a large role in assigning an identity to other projects.
This is possibly the a reason for the high amount of graffiti on the
building walls as compared to other nearby buildings. Other reasons for
the graffiti can be attributed to its lack of significance in the
surrounding community. |
Plan
Parking
Dense Planting
Name five typical problems caused by poorly
designed high density housing, (case study two).
|
Landscape and Density
|
One hundred to 120 feet between high rise
residential buildings provides adequate privacy. This can be
augmented by planting rapid growing trees that reach 80' or more.
This vertical buffer is in proportion to the buildings but out of scale
with the pedestrian. Therefore, under story planting of trees,
shrubs and ground cover is necessary to form a comfortable space.
For a through investigation of residential densities in detached,
duplex and multi-family buildings see the housing
density section below.
|
Landscape between Buildings |
|
This image shows a mixed use
building that includes retail shops, restaurants and entertainment places
on the ground floor and residential housing above. Notice that the
commercial walkway is covered and about 1 1/2 stories high. The
residential units extend over the commercial walk to the curb edge.
The residences each have balconies for some outdoor space and the
balconies shade the windows of the units below.
Mixed use development at this density means that all of the daily
shopping requirements of the residents are met within a block or two.
Mixed use should include urban open space in immediate proximity to
residential units. Access to these shopping and recreation
opportunities is the compensation the urban dweller must have for the
sacrifice of private open space. |
Mixed Use
Urban Open Space
What are the characteristics of the mixed use development
presented on the "housing" web page?
|
|
Access to diverse activities and amenities such as public
transportation, recreation and open space, employment, cultural
amenities (theater, art, music) and parking is a benefit of
living in high density situations. The availability of resources
draws people to a city out of the desire for an exciting environment.
Be certain the new designs contain access to the full spectrum of
opportunities.
|
|
|
Urban design can not solve the problem of crime in cities because the
reasons for crime include poverty, despair, racial and religious
prejudices and other maladies of modern life. But urban design can
discourage crime through thoughtful design of public areas, residential
districts and the provision of the elements of healthy neighborhoods.
Create designs where safety is a priority by lighting and planting design
that emphasizes visual access especially near building doorways and on
routes between pedestrian destinations.
|
Gated Entry to Residential Housing
Name two aspects of safe neighborhoods. |
|
Regional architecture and landscape character are important to tie
new development to local history and give inhabitants a sense of
appreciation in their surroundings. As a result of mixed income
housing, diversity in building size and style prevents monotony while also
providing for increased parking opportunities. Rooftop gardens are a
positive feature in the urban setting. Tall buildings can view roof
top gardens on top of shorter buildings.
Landscaped environments can offer aesthetic quality while being low
maintenance. Plantings provide unity from one block to the next. Street
trees provide vertical and overhead planes as well as shade for pedestrian
walkways, parking areas, and buildings—thus reducing energy costs from
air conditioning. Shrubs along the perimeters of buildings increase
aesthetics and aid in preventing vandalism.
|
Dense planting in an enclosed space between residential towers.
Roof Garden |
|
A benefit of urban development is
that the availability of water, sewage, gas and data lines are more
economical for the city and the developer to provide than in suburban
areas areas. |
|
|
The design of urban residential
project requires more than attention to densities above 10 units per acre.
It means the provision of recreation, great public landscapes and
architectural character, art, shopping, transportation and employment is a
compact district. |
Sitting area in a residential area |
Town Houses
|
This
plan utilizes two story townhouses. The lot area is 535' by 270'
(3.3 acres). There are 20 units per acre (66 total units) with
above ground parking for 83 cars (1.25 per unit). The units are 700 square feet
each. The yards are 600 square feet. 25% of the site is
dedicated to circulation and open space. |
Plan
What are the typical housing densities for single family
(detached), three story apartments and 6 to 10 story condominiums (or
apartments)? |
Apartments
|
This
plan features three story walk-up apartments. The lot area is 535' by
270' (3.3 acres). There are eight buildings of 12 units each for a
total of 96. Each unit is 1600 square feet and the ground floor
units have a small patio. The density is 30 units per acre.
Circulation and open space amount to 25% of the site.
|
Plan
|
Six Story Building
|
This
scheme includes six story apartment buildings with 40 units per building
for a total of 240 units. This figure is reduce by two units per
building to account for lobbies for an adjusted total of 232 units.
The resulting density is 70 units per acre. The parking is on two
levels accommodating 290 cars ( 1.25 per unit). The top of the
garage structure serves as plaza or recreation space. |
Plan
|
Ten Story Buildings
|
The site is 3.3 acres. One level of
underground parking for 300 cars (1.25 cars per unit) is indicated by the
shaded area. There are 120 units per building for a total of 240
units. The resulting density is 72 units per acre. Examples of
this housing is shown at left. You can see that given ample space
between buildings, views and access to high quality open space this pattern
can result in a desirable permanent residence. When transportation and
space between buildings is not adequately provided for then the quality of
life for the residents is compromised. Therefore, comprehensive
planning and urban planning controls are necessary to assure that the
cumulative effect of many projects does not compromise the neighborhood. |
Plan
|
Cul-de-sac Development
|
Theses plans are based on the need
for a private yard in a suburban setting. The resulting densities are too
low of effectively support mass transit (except) park and ride options. |
|
Size/Density Comparison
|
The images at left show a variety of single
family development patterns or attached housing with private yard.
The table compares designs according to several measures. An
estimate of seven to ten units per acre to support mass transit systems
illustrate the marginal application of most of the designs to urban
centers.
|
Duplex |
Duplex |
Triplex |
Quadplex |
Square feet per unit |
2440 |
2200 |
1800 |
900 |
Average lot size |
7854 |
4888 |
6375 |
4628 |
Off-street parking |
4 |
2+ |
2 |
2 |
Minor Street width |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Minor street right-of-way |
28 |
28 |
28 |
28 |
Street pavement per dwelling |
761 |
615 |
715 |
535 |
Linear feet of street per dwelling |
36 |
30 |
34 |
25 |
Curbs and gutters per dwelling |
68 |
55 |
63 |
47 |
Density |
4 |
7.25 |
6 |
8.25 |
|
Table
|
Duplexes
|
Maximum site utilization with semi-detached
houses with no open space and straight street grid. The distance between
pairs of units is 13'. The gross site area is 20 acres.
There are 198 dwellings of 1,400 square feet each. The density is
about 10 units per acre.
|
Plan
|
Mixed Density
|
This plan mixes single family housing, duplexes
and row houses. Some public open space is provided for the row
housing sections. |
Plan
|
Townhouse Development
|
This plan features townhouses
arranged in clusters. Small private outdoor spaces are
provided. No public space is provided but social open space
(intended for residents not strangers) is provided to each housing group with
access through the private open space. |
Plan
For this townhouse development what types of
open spaces are provided?
What density would you anticipate? |
Townhouse Development
|
This is another version of a
townhouse development. It utilizes a typical city street grid making
it a part of the fabric of the city. However, the grid is modified
to eliminate through traffic routes that would encourage higher traffic
volumes and speed. |
|
Cluster Development
|
This plan groups pairs of duplexes
into a cluster. Open space and exterior views. A series of
these cluster developments could include interior parks. Access from
two collector roads is a positive aspect of the plan. Private
garages or carports are efficiently grouped near the collectors. The
density is about 6 units per acres. |
Plan
|
Three Units per Lot
|
This development provides for a
compact development development pattern while providing semi-private
outdoor space and garages. Enlarge the section first to discover how
the dwelling s are distributed. The resulting density is 14 units per acre
with shared social space and private balconies for private open space. The last
two images show how the clusters
would be distributed in a large development. Images are from The
New Urbanism by Peter Katz
|
Section
This section shows three units and represents
a mix of housing types (single family ownership to rental apartment) on
a single lot. What is the density of this type of development?
Guidelines
Development |
Townhouse Group
|
This townhouse cluster groups
units in a way that breaks the typical row house impact. Garages are
included under two stories of living space. The units are tall and
narrow. The density of this pattern is quite high if large private
yard are not provided.
|
Elevation |
Subdivision
|
This plan is of a
single family residential subdivision. It is the model for much suburban development in the United States. The
disadvantage of this model, and many of the examples above, is the single
use. No commercial retail or office uses are included in the
development. The combined impact of many of these subdivisions
adjacent to each other is that residents are entirely dependent on the
private auto to gain access to shopping and work. Mass transit can
not serve subdivisions like this because the density is to low to justify
the cost of the transit system. |
Plan |
This table of thumbnail images show
additional images of the housing projects featured in the discussion or
additional examples. All of the projects are in Turin Italy. All
copyrights are reserved to Gary Austin. Do not reproduce without
permission |
|
|
|
|
Suburban density |
|
|
|
|
High density residential project |
Pedestrian garage entrance |
Vehicular garage entrance |
Urban mixed use density |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily Housing in the US (All images; Austin, 2004)
Architecture and
Urbanism, World Housing
|