The following excerpt was taken from the 1994 edition of AASHTO's A
Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (pp. 174-177).
Any motor vehicle follows a transition path as it enters or leaves a circular
horizontal curve. The steering change and the consequent gain or loss of centrifugal force
cannot be effected instantly. For most curves the average driver can effect a suitable
transition path within the limits of normal lane width. However, with combinations of high
speed and sharp curvature the resultant longer transition can result in crowding and
sometimes actual occupation of adjoining lanes. In such instances transition curves would
be appropriate because they make it easier for a driver to confine the vehicle to his or
her own lane. The employment of transition curves between tangents and sharp circular
curves and between circular curves of substantially different radii warrants
consideration.
The principal advantages of transition curves in horizontal alignment are the
following:
- A properly designed transition curve provides a natural, easy-to-follow path for
drivers, such that the centrifugal force increases or decreases gradually as a vehicle
enters or leaves a circular curve. . . .
- The transition curve length provides a convenient desirable arrangement for
superelevation runoff. . . .
- The spiral facilitates the transition in width where the traveled way section is to be
widened around a circular curve. . . .
- The appearance of the highway or street is enhanced by the application of spirals. . . .
Generally, the Euler spiral, which is also known as the clothoid, is used. The radius
varies from infinity at the tangent end of the spiral to the radius of the circular arc at
the circular curve end. . . .
Length of Spiral
The following equation, developed in 1909 by Shortt for gradual attainment of centripetal
acceleration on railroad track curves, is the basic expression used by some for computing
minimum length of a spiral:
L = (0.0702*V3)/(RC)
where:
L = minimum length of spiral, m;
V = speed, km/h;
R = curve radius, m; and
C = rate of increase of centripetal acceleration, m/s3.
The factor C is an empirical value indicating the comfort and safety involved. The
value of C = 1 generally is accepted for railroad operation, but values ranging from 1 to
3 have been used for highways. . . . A more practical control for the length of spiral is
that in which it equals the length required for superelevation runoff.
. . . Current practice indicates that for appearance and comfort the length of
superelevation runoff should not exceed a longitudinal slope (edge compared to centerline
of a two-lane highway) of 1:200. In other words, when considering a two-lane highway with
plane sections, the difference in longitudinal gradient between the edge of traveled way
profile and its centerline profile should not exceed 0.5 percent.