Summary of forensic Identification methods and characteristics (put on web)
(1) reference database
(2) characteristics measured are discrete
(3) independent verification possible
(4) labs pass proficiency tests
Method |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
discredited |
DNA |
+ |
+ |
+ |
varies |
no |
bullet lead |
? |
- |
- |
- |
yes |
fingerprints pre-1990 |
- ¤ |
- |
- |
- |
yes |
fingerprints post 2000 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
? |
no |
hair matching |
- |
- |
- |
- |
yes |
bite marks |
- |
- |
- |
- |
yes |
shoeprint ID |
- |
- |
- |
- |
yes |
dog sniffing |
- |
- |
- |
- |
yes |
eyewitness |
-* |
- |
- |
-1 |
still used |
¤ - a database existed but was difficult to screen and could not be used to give a RMP
* a photo catalog can be considered a ref database but is not used properly as one bc/ the witness is only allowed to choose one
1 Ð individuals fail proficiency tests, but this is not the same as a lab being subjected to a prof test