HW2 Total Explicit Protocol Replication Standards/knowns Randomization Blind
Post code Article Info (4) Goal of Study (2) Causal Model (3) Relevance (1) Status (2) Quote (2) Relevance (1) Status (2) Quote (2) Relevance (1) Status (2) Quote (2) Relevance (1) Status (2) Quote (2) Relevance (1) Status (2) Quote (2) Point Deductions Explaination Total 
105 0 0
107 31 3 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 title of article/date (1) 31
109 29 4 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 date of article not within last 9 months (2); quote for explicit protocol; standards would be relevant due the fact that you need to know how the subject behaves without the video game as a baseline 29
111 28 4 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 4 late assignment (4) 28
119 0 0
120 0 0
121 20 4 2 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 1 3 title date not provided (1); date of article not within last 9 months (2); model not a hypothesis/not causual (3); replication would be relevant in having many trials or different companies testing the same protocol, did not include status (required) thus no points can be awarded for the lack of the possible need of a quote; don't see how quote supports the present status; for an absent status in blind a quote does not need to be provided  20
125 33 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 33
127 13 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 2 date of article not within last 9 months (2); none of the status/quotes lined up with the ideal data  13
129 32 4 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 randomization would be relevant in regards to different places where subjects reside 32
130 0 0
134 30 4 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 included data in explicit protocol quote (1); quote for blind does not support the status of ambigious  30
135 20 3 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 2 date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); did no provide quote for explicit protocol  20
136 31 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 date of article not within last 9 months (2); quote for standard does not fully support ideal feature - would want behavior of subject before stimulation with video game 31
140 31 3 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 date of article/source not provided (1) 31
141 26 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 1 2 1 2 2 2 article title, source, date missing (2); model not stated as a causation (2); did not follow directions - for status did not use instructed words of "present, absent or ambigous/uncertian (3); quote to support explicit protocol is weak; it would be relevant to randomize the test subjects 26
142 0 0
147 31 4 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 31
151 0 0
154 23 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); replication is present with many subjects 23
168 0 0
170 29 3 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 title source/date (1); based on quote from explicit protocol the status is present; quote of standards/knowns does not support the status of present;  29
171 29 4 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 date of article not within last 9 months (2); status of the standard should be present based on quote provided 29
173 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 document submitted was blank 0
176 0 0
179 23 3 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 article title, source, date missing (2)  23
180 26 4 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 model being tested not stated as hypothesis; quote for explicit protocol does not describe how it was done; replication is always relevent  26
181 19 2 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 6 date of article not within last 9 months (2); incorrect template (4) 19
182 22 4 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 4 model not causual (1); included data in explicit protocol quote (1); replication/standards quotes did not support the present status, do not need a quote for ambigious status of rnadomization 22
183 28 4 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 explicit protocol is always relevant  28
187 26 3 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 4 not article (4) 26
188 0 0
190 34 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 34
191 26 3 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); source and date not provided (1) 26
192 28 3 2 3 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 title source/date (1); quote for explicit protocol/replication/standards does not provide evidence for data  28
197 19 3 2 0 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 7 not article (4); article not within 9 months (2); replication is always relevant (1) 19
199 31 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 date of article not provided along with source (2);  31
203 34 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 4 late assignment (4) 34
217 30 3 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 quote for explicit protocol does not include how the study was performed; quote for blind does not match  30
226 22 4 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 date of article not within last 9 months (2); model not properly stated (1); quote for replication does not support ideal data feature; no need for quote if ideal data feature is absent;  22
227 27 3 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 title source/date (1); quote regarding standards/knowns does not like up with the goal of study - is it the drinking of beetroot juice what reduces blood pressure or the presence of the nitrate in the beetroot juice, did not define if plood pressure was taken before and after and in the goal/model it said that it "may lower blood pressure in people who suffer from high blood pressure (2); standards/knowns would be blood pressure before and after the trial period 27
233 29 4 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); 29
234 33 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 33
241 28 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); no quote needed for absent ideal data features  28
242 32 3 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 title source/date (1) 32
248 32 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 2 2 1 2 2 quote for standards/knowns does not fully support present status; randomization would be relevent because you would want a pool of random subjects regarding how they sleep and go about their daily lives because that could be a factor if the subjects are not randomized;  32
254 30 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 0 no quote needed for absent ideal data feature  30
256 0 0
257 32 4 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 32
259 0
262 32 4 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 32
264 33 4 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 quote for explicit protocol does not include how the study was performed;  33
265 32 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); 32
271 30 4 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 quote from explicit protocol does not support the present status; quote included for absent status of standards (would it be relevant to have standards in this situation?); did not include status for blind  30
272 28 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 date of article not within last 9 months (2); quotes did not line up well with the ideal data  28
275 33 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 33
278 34 4 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 34
283 28 3 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 title source/date (1) 28
285 31 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 31
287 27 3 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 source of article; goal is poorly worded, does not make sense; explicit protocol quote does not support the data point; any data features that are absent do not need quotes associated with them 27
289 0 0
290 28 4 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 lost points on quotes because there were quotes included if the status was absent (you would not have a quote to support the ideal data item if it is absent) 28
292 19 3 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 6 title source/date (1); model being tested not stated as hypothesis (2), model is not causual (3); quote of explicit protocal has nothing to do with explicit protocol; quote of standards/knows does not support present status; quote of randomization does not support status of present and relevant of no  19
295 27 3 2 3 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 title source/date (1); explicit protocol quote does not provide evidence of explicit protocol - need explaination of how it was exectued; quote for replication does not support ideal data point;  27
297 24 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 4 title source/date (1); model is not stated as hypothesis (3), model is not causal (2) 24