|
|
HW2 Total |
|
|
|
Explicit Protocol |
Replication |
Standards/knowns |
Randomization |
Blind |
|
|
|
|
Post code |
|
Article Info (4) |
Goal of Study (2) |
Causal Model (3) |
Relevance (1) |
Status (2) |
Quote (2) |
Relevance (1) |
Status (2) |
Quote (2) |
Relevance (1) |
Status (2) |
Quote (2) |
Relevance (1) |
Status (2) |
Quote (2) |
Relevance (1) |
Status (2) |
Quote (2) |
Point Deductions |
Explaination |
Total |
|
105 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
107 |
31 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
title of article/date (1) |
31 |
|
109 |
29 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
date of article not within last 9 months (2); quote for explicit
protocol; standards would be relevant due the fact that you need to know how
the subject behaves without the video game as a baseline |
29 |
|
111 |
28 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
late assignment (4) |
28 |
|
119 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
120 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
121 |
20 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
title date not provided (1); date of article not within last 9 months
(2); model not a hypothesis/not causual (3); replication would be relevant in
having many trials or different companies testing the same protocol, did not
include status (required) thus no points can be awarded for the lack of the
possible need of a quote; don't see how quote supports the present status;
for an absent status in blind a quote does not need to be provided |
20 |
|
125 |
33 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
33 |
|
127 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
date of article not within last 9 months (2); none of the status/quotes
lined up with the ideal data |
13 |
|
129 |
32 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
randomization would be relevant in regards to different places where
subjects reside |
32 |
|
130 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
134 |
30 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
included data in explicit protocol quote (1); quote for blind does not
support the status of ambigious |
30 |
|
135 |
20 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); did no provide quote for
explicit protocol |
20 |
|
136 |
31 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
date of article not within last 9 months (2); quote for standard does not
fully support ideal feature - would want behavior of subject before
stimulation with video game |
31 |
|
140 |
31 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
date of article/source not provided (1) |
31 |
|
141 |
26 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
article title, source, date missing (2); model not stated as a causation
(2); did not follow directions - for status did not use instructed words of
"present, absent or ambigous/uncertian (3); quote to support explicit
protocol is weak; it would be relevant to randomize the test subjects |
26 |
|
142 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
147 |
31 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
31 |
|
151 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
154 |
23 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); replication is present with
many subjects |
23 |
|
168 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
170 |
29 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
title source/date (1); based on quote from explicit protocol the status
is present; quote of standards/knowns does not support the status of
present; |
29 |
|
171 |
29 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
date of article not within last 9 months (2); status of the standard
should be present based on quote provided |
29 |
|
173 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
document submitted was blank |
0 |
|
176 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
179 |
23 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
article title, source, date missing (2) |
23 |
|
180 |
26 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
model being tested not stated as hypothesis; quote for explicit protocol
does not describe how it was done; replication is always relevent |
26 |
|
181 |
19 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
date of article not within last 9 months (2); incorrect template (4) |
19 |
|
182 |
22 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
model not causual (1); included data in explicit protocol quote (1);
replication/standards quotes did not support the present status, do not need
a quote for ambigious status of rnadomization |
22 |
|
183 |
28 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
explicit protocol is always relevant |
28 |
|
187 |
26 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
not article (4) |
26 |
|
188 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
190 |
34 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
34 |
|
191 |
26 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); source and date not provided
(1) |
26 |
|
192 |
28 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
title source/date (1); quote for explicit protocol/replication/standards
does not provide evidence for data |
28 |
|
197 |
19 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
7 |
not article (4); article not within 9 months (2); replication is always
relevant (1) |
19 |
|
199 |
31 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
date of article not provided along with source (2); |
31 |
|
203 |
34 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
late assignment (4) |
34 |
|
217 |
30 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
quote for explicit protocol does not include how the study was performed;
quote for blind does not match |
30 |
|
226 |
22 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
date of article not within last 9 months (2); model not properly stated
(1); quote for replication does not support ideal data feature; no need for
quote if ideal data feature is absent; |
22 |
|
227 |
27 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
title source/date (1); quote regarding standards/knowns does not like up
with the goal of study - is it the drinking of beetroot juice what reduces
blood pressure or the presence of the nitrate in the beetroot juice, did not
define if plood pressure was taken before and after and in the goal/model it
said that it "may lower blood pressure in people who suffer from high
blood pressure (2); standards/knowns would be blood pressure before and after
the trial period |
27 |
|
233 |
29 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); |
29 |
|
234 |
33 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
33 |
|
241 |
28 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); no quote needed for absent
ideal data features |
28 |
|
242 |
32 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
title source/date (1) |
32 |
|
248 |
32 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
quote for standards/knowns does not fully support present status;
randomization would be relevent because you would want a pool of random
subjects regarding how they sleep and go about their daily lives because that
could be a factor if the subjects are not randomized; |
32 |
|
254 |
30 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
no quote needed for absent ideal data feature |
30 |
|
256 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
257 |
32 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
32 |
|
259 |
0 |
|
|
262 |
32 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
32 |
|
264 |
33 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
quote for explicit protocol does not include how the study was
performed; |
33 |
|
265 |
32 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
date of artcle not within last 9 months (2); |
32 |
|
271 |
30 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
quote from explicit protocol does not support the present status; quote
included for absent status of standards (would it be relevant to have
standards in this situation?); did not include status for blind |
30 |
|
272 |
28 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
date of article not within last 9 months (2); quotes did not line up well
with the ideal data |
28 |
|
275 |
33 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
33 |
|
278 |
34 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
34 |
|
283 |
28 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
title source/date (1) |
28 |
|
285 |
31 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
31 |
|
287 |
27 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
source of article; goal is poorly worded, does not make sense; explicit
protocol quote does not support the data point; any data features that are
absent do not need quotes associated with them |
27 |
|
289 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
290 |
28 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
lost points on quotes because there were quotes included if the status
was absent (you would not have a quote to support the ideal data item if it
is absent) |
28 |
|
292 |
19 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
title source/date (1); model being tested not stated as hypothesis (2),
model is not causual (3); quote of explicit protocal has nothing to do with
explicit protocol; quote of standards/knows does not support present status;
quote of randomization does not support status of present and relevant of
no |
19 |
|
295 |
27 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
title source/date (1); explicit protocol quote does not provide evidence
of explicit protocol - need explaination of how it was exectued; quote for
replication does not support ideal data point; |
27 |
|
297 |
24 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
title source/date (1); model is not stated as hypothesis (3), model is
not causal (2) |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|