Summarizing values to Describe Plant
communities
Assessing Composition
Composition, like diversity and similarity, is a variable that is not
measured in the field, it is one that is calculated attribute based on plant
measurements. Composition is defined as
the proportions (%) of various plant species in relation to the total on
a given area. Composition is also known as "species composition" or
"botanical composition."
Why estimate composition?
-
Traditional rangeland guides for proper
stocking rates and range condition are based on plant composition and the
classic range succession theory.
-
Composition has been used extensively to
describe ecological sites and to evaluate rangeland condition.
-
Measurements of composition over time can be
used to characterize trend or changes in rangeland condition.
-
Allows comparison of dominance of individual
plants across plant communities. For example, two sites my be very different
but they could both have about 50% mesquite by weight.
-
Composition can be calculated based on
individual species or groups such as % of noxious weeds, or % forbs,
grasses, and shrubs.
-
Species composition is expressed as % of total
community; this is easy to understand. Composition is an attribute can
therefore be more easily visualized by those unfamiliar with rangelands or
the range of that area.
Calculating Composition
Species composition is generally expressed as a percent, so that all species
components add up to 100%. Composition can be calculated with measures of cover,
density, weight or biomass. It is not appropriate to estimate
composition based on frequency.
Frequency is regarded as an unsuitable basis for the description of
species composition, because simply recording the presence of a species
does not indicate its absolute amount.
- Using Density
Data
- Using Biomass
Data
- Using Cover
Data
For example, the composition based on density of shrubs on a Clay Loam
site South Texas from a previous lesson is:
Shrub |
Clay Loam |
Calculation |
% Composition |
blackbrush |
156 |
156 ÷ 472 = |
33% |
guajillo |
176 |
176 ÷ 472 = |
38% |
catclaw acacia |
43 |
43 ÷ 472 = |
9% |
granjeno |
56 |
56 ÷ 472 = |
12% |
whitebrush |
25 |
25 ÷ 472 = |
5% |
kidneywood |
15 |
15 ÷ 472 = |
3% |
elbowbush |
1 |
1 ÷ 472 = |
<1% |
wolfberry |
0 |
0 ÷ 472 = |
0% |
shrubby bluesage |
0 |
0 ÷ 472 = |
0% |
|
472 |
|
100% |
What is the composition of a few shrubs on the
Sandy Loam site?
Shrub |
Sandy Loam |
|
blackbrush |
65 |
|
guajillo |
55 |
? |
catclaw acacia |
45 |
|
granjeno |
32 |
? |
whitebrush |
67 |
|
kidneywood |
25 |
|
elbowbush |
70 |
? |
wolfberry |
28 |
|
shrubby bluesage |
40 |
|
|
427 |
|
Click here for Answers
Value of Calculating and Comparing Cover
- Allows for "relative" comparison of individual species across sites or
times that vary significantly.
- The composition reflects the relative contribution of a species to a
community and reflects dominance of a specific species on a site.
- Many management objectives are focused on the assessment or manipulation
of species composition. For example, a land manager may want to:
» minimize the composition of noxious weeds in a
community.
» increase the relative abundance of desirable
forage species in a pasture.
» alter the relative contribution of various
species that provide shelter or food for wildlife.
|