| |
Introduction
Public involvement can mean different things to different people and
organizations. This manual uses the following general definition in
relation to public land management agencies:
Public involvement includes all activities used by public land management
agencies to inform and educate the public about the agency’s land management
activities, and/or to gather information from the public, and/or to include
public input in making decisions about public land management. The public is
defined as individuals and organizations (both public and private) outside the
agency.
Other definitions have been used by the government and its agencies. At
the time most US public land management agencies were beginning legally-mandated
public involvement activities the US Congress defined public involvement in the
Land Use and Resource Conservation Act of 1975 as:
The opportunity for maximum feasible participation by citizens in rulemaking,
decision making and land use planning, including public hearings, advisory
mechanisms and such other procedures as may be necessary to provide public input
in a particular instance.
In 1973 the USDA Forest Service in its Forest Service Manual 8212 defined
public involvement as:
The use of appropriate procedures for informing the public, obtaining early
and continuing public participation and considering the views of interested
parties in planning and decision-making processes. The "public"
referred to includes individuals, local, state, regional and national public
service organizations and interest groups. It also includes state, local and
other Federal agencies which have jurisdiction, special expertise or information
to offer relevant to the total planning and implementation picture.
This definition was still widely used in the forestry profession 25 years
later. New Forest Service rules may contain an expanded collaborative role
for the public in the planning process.
In 1998 the National Park Service's "Directors Order #2: Park Planning
defined public involvement as:
Public participation in planning and decision making will ensure that the
National Park Service fully understands and considers the publics’ interests
in the parks as part of their national heritage, cultural traditions, and
community surroundings. To the maximum extent possible, the National Park
Service will actively seek out and consult with existing and potential visitors,
neighbors, people with traditional cultural ties to park lands, scientists and
scholars, concessionaires, cooperating associations, other partners, and
government agencies. The Park Service will work cooperatively with others to
improve the conditions of parks, to expand public service, and to integrate
parks into sustainable ecological, cultural, and socioeconomic systems.
Public involvement activities can take a variety of forms and agency control
varies depending on the type of activity and who initiates it. The
following table illustrates the categories within which public involvement may occur
with some illustrative examples.
|
Formal
based on established methods and documented accordingly |
Informal
|
Managed
the agency has control over a particular method |
public hearings, workshops, public comments, field trips, newsletters |
lunch with community leaders, key informants, newspaper articles
(including letters to the editor) |
Unmanaged
by the agency, others may or may not have control |
lawsuits, voting, lobbying |
sabotage/ecotage, protests, riots, demonstrations, boycotts |
Public involvement is a process. The tools and techniques used,
time frame, facilitators, and outcomes will vary depending on the objectives of
the activities. Nonetheless some general recommendations for
effective public involvement are possible.
Clarify the goals of public involvement. Is the purpose to
provide the public with information about an agency decision, to gain input
from the public, or to share decision making? The methods to be used and the
expectations of the agency and the public will vary depending on the goals.
The goals need to be explicit from the outset and understood by both the
agency and the public.
The public involvement process as well as the outcome is important. The
public should be involved early and continuously in the planning process.
Including the public from the time the scope of the issue is defined
throughout the entire planning process can increase a sense of participation
and ownership in the outcome and make implementation of the plan possible.
In order to be most effective, public involvement must include a two-way
flow of information. While simple education efforts may be appropriate in
limited circumstances, maximum benefit can be obtained from a sharing of
information and solicitation of input. Public involvement must build a bridge
between the agency and the public so that they may share expertise and
concerns to develop better plans.
Using a variety of public involvement methods will help to reach a
diversity of stakeholders and solicit different types of input. Public
involvement practitioners have found that people get their information from
different sources and are willing to participate in different forums. In order
to fully understand and consider public opinions, a variety of methods are
necessary. Some factors to consider when determining which methods to use
include the topic, the number and type of stakeholders, the amount of
controversy associated with the issue, citizen understanding of the issue,
available resources, and agency credibility.
This manual continues with a framework that can be used for planning public involvement.
A wide variety of tools and techniques are then described. Each have their
strengths and weaknesses and are appropriate for different purposes.
Methods for evaluating the results of public involvement activities are
outlined. Potentially useful references and links are provided.
return to top
|