University of Idaho Psychology of Learning
Lesson 2: Lecture 3 Transcript
 
Home
Syllabus
Schedule
Contact
Help

 

Department of Psychology

  ©
 
University of Idaho
  All rights reserved.

  Psychology Dept.
  University of Idaho

 


 

 


 

 

Back  
Transcript of Audio Lecture
Hello again.

In this section we begin discussing principles, materials and aspects that are related to classical conditioning. Let’s begin by starting with slide two.

As remember from last section, the classical conditioning paradigm goes something like this. We have some kind of unconditioned stimulus which causes an unconditioned response. We then pair that with a conditioned stimulus, so the conditioned stimulus is presented, then the unconditioned stimulus and then we get an unconditioned response. And over a period of time, the conditioned stimulus alone causes the conditioned response.

As we see on slide three, we can graph this process. Generally, we can look at the amount of salivation the organism makes during aspects of conditioning. As we see in the first section, our unconditioned stimulus is basically causing an unconditioned response. Then pairing the UCS with a conditioned stimulus. So, once we put the food in the mouth of the organism the response goes up real high. That is, we’re making some maximum amount of salivation, and that’s going to continue as we present the CS.

Then the conditioned stimulus causes the conditioned response, and the organism salivates for a particular period of time. However, there is a concept that occurs after this conditioned stimulus alone is causing the conditioned response. This concept is referred to as extinction. As we see in slide four, extinction is defined as a decrease in a conditioned response due to repeated exposures. This occurs when the unconditioned stimulus is not present. As we see in the graph on slide five, we started off the same as we did before. Our conditioned stimulus caused a conditioned response. But as we continue to present the conditioned response, the amount of salivation continues to decreases and it goes lower and lower until ultimately it reaches zero.

The next concept we will talk about is what we call spontaneous recovery. This occurs after extinction has occurred. Basically what we do is give the animal a rest period. So we take the animal out of its cage, we put it into its home cage and let it play around with other rats or whatever it does. Then, in a day or so , we come back, put it back into the chamber and we present the conditioned stimulus again. What you see is a conditioned response, but it is lower than the original conditioned response. We can also do that several times and we see that in slide seven and in slide eight. So let’s look at slide seven first.

What began was an unconditioned stimulus causing an unconditioned response and on and on. Then we had our conditioned stimulus causing our conditioned response. The amount of salivation was high initially, then the organism went on extinction and salivation reduced to zero. We then had the rest period of 24 hours. We then bring the animal back, put it back in the system, ring the bell, and lo and behold, the response occurs again.

Now again note that the amount of responding in spontaneous recovery is much lower than the amount of salivation when we had the CS, UCS paired together. This process continues on in slide eight. So after we get the first spontaneous recovery, we take it out of the cage, give it another rest period and bring it back the second day. So in day two, what do we see when we ring the bell again? The organism responds again, and it is also lower than what we found on the day one of spontaneous recovery. We again give it a rest period, come back, and ring the bell again on day three. And lo and behold, again the organism makes a response but note that it is much smaller than on day two.

Now there are a couple of points to note within spontaneous recovery and we see them on slide nine. Number one, there must be a rest period. If you don’t have a rest period, no spontaneous recovery occurs. Number two, the height of the spontaneous recovery conditioned response is lower than the height of the original conditioned response. And again, as we continue on during the other days, the amount continues to decrease and decrease over time.

Until you come to the concept of slide 10. That is what we call total extinction. That is, when you present a conditioned stimulus after spontaneous recovery and you get no conditioned response. That is, you ring the bell and nothing happens. That is what we call total extinction.

In addition to that, we also have some other concepts that also occur as well. The first of these concepts is generalization. Generalization is defined as “When a response is acquired to a conditioned stimulus, other conditioned stimuli will also evoke the same conditioned response.” In addition, the closer the new stimulus is to the original conditioned stimulus, the higher the probability that it will occur. This is demonstrated on slide 12. Let’s say that we’re going to use a conditioned stimulus such as a red light. So we’re going to pair a red light with a chocolate chip cookie and you get salivation. So you present the red light, you present the cookie. and you get salivation. You do it a few times and pretty soon the light causes salivation.

Now what would happen if you changed the color of the light. For example, instead of using a red light, you use an orange-red light. Lo and behold, when you present the orange-red light, you get the same conditioned response. When you change that light and you make it a little bit different, so for example we use a yellow-red light, we get less of a conditioned response. That is, we get less salivation that’s out there. Until finally, if we just give a yellow light, we get no conditioned response.

This relates to a concept that we see in slide 13. That is, the concept of discrimination. Here the organism differentiates or discriminates between the original stimulus and the new conditioned stimulus. So with the yellow light, the organism discriminates in contrast to the red light. So the organism is presented with the original conditioned stimulus and a new one. When the organism responds to the original conditioned stimulus and not to the new conditioned stimulus, that is called generalization.

Now the next concept that I want to discuss that relates to classical conditioning is what we call higher order conditioning. It is also called secondary conditioning

So let’s go to slide 15 and look at what happens here. In this example, we begin with the traditional classical conditioning paradigm. So we have our UCS causing the UCR, our CS is then paired with the UCS, and over a period of time, the CS alone causes the conditioned response. The question then became, what would happen if we paired a second conditioned stimulus (CS2) with the original conditioned stimulus, (CS1). Lo and behold, Pavlov found that after we present conditioned stimulus two, you would also get a conditioned response. Now the response may be a little bit lower than the original, but it was still there.

Let’s take it one step further. So we take conditioned stimulus three. We now pair it with conditioned stimulus two and you get a conditioned response. Lo and behold over time, conditioned stimulus three causes the conditioned response.

And here’s a classic example of higher order conditioning and it’s related to the classroom. Let’s say that class discipline causes pain, fear, embarrassment, etc. Take a teacher. The teacher gives discipline, you get pain and fear, and lo and behold, the teacher alone begins to become associated with pain and fear. This is the traditional classical conditioning paradigm that we’ve talked about.

But, things also associated with the teacher also become problematic. For example, the classroom is paired with the teacher, so the classroom becomes conditioned stimulus two. We pair it with the teacher, conditioned stimulus one. You get pain and fear. And lo and behold, the classroom alone begins to be associated with pain and fear. Now, again, it’s not the original level, but as a result, a kid doesn’t want to be in the classroom. So the kid will say, “I don’t like going to school,” or something to that extent. You can also take the example out further if you wish.

The point with is these variables influence classical conditioning. They can all have major impacts. And note that through higher order conditioning a totally unrelated stimulus can ultimately end up causing a conditioned response.

In the next section, we’re going to talk about some variables that influence classical conditioning and how those begin to work. So until that time, you have yourself a good day.


Back